Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

59256

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
General rules cannot be made for land where aggregate mining has taken place. Each location requires its own unique, individual impartial environmental assessment. Soil/excess soil must all be analyzed before moving/dumping. Read more

Comment ID

59327

Commenting on behalf of

The Oxford Coalition for Social Justice

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The following comments are offered in good faith by the Oxford Coalition for Social Justice in order to assist the NDMNRF in improving their proposal related to bringing excess soil onto aggregate zones for rehabilitation. Read more

Comment ID

59340

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Federation of Agriculture

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On behalf of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, please find attached our submission regarding ERO # 019-4801 (Proposed regulatory changes for the beneficial reuse of excess soil at pits and quarries in Ontario). Thank you. Read more

Comment ID

59345

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The timeline is too short to address this ERO. An extension of at least another 60 days would provide community groups, municipalities, scientists,and others an opportunity to properly analyse the proposed regulations and their implications. Read more

Comment ID

59349

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is impossible to believe that a responsible government would give this proposal any attention what so ever. The pollution issues are staggering. Dumping unqualified material next to our exposed water tables is complete folly. Read more

Comment ID

59350

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1. The timeline is too short to address this ERO. An extension of at least another 60 days would provide community groups, municipalities, scientists, and others an opportunity to properly analyse the proposed regulations and their implications. Read more

Comment ID

59354

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These proposed regulations represent significant threats to communities, ecosystems, farmland, surface and groundwater due to the lack of appropriate soil testing before dumping in pits containing groundwater. Read more

Comment ID

59355

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Spent pits and quarries should be rehabilitated not turned into dumps for soil from construction sites. Any soil that touches the water table should be preinspected for contamination and rejected should any exist in any quantity. Read more

Comment ID

59359

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There is no justification for dumping soil into groundwater. Placing soil into groundwater has the potential for disastrous results on the surrounding community! You must remove any reference to placing soil into groundwater. Read more

Comment ID

59360

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1. The timeline is too short to address this ERO. An extension of at least another 60 days would provide community groups, municipalities, scientists, and others an opportunity to properly analyze the proposed regulations and their implications. Read more

Comment ID

59364

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I object to these proposed changes for the following reasons: 1. The permitted comment period for this posting is too brief. I would suggest an additional 60 days would be appropriate to allow for adequate input. Read more

Comment ID

59388

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hello and thank you for the opportunity to submit comments. I have a background as a heavy equipment operator and natural gas underground pipe repair tech. Also some experience with toxic spills and soils contaminated by leaching. Here is an example of leaching. Read more

Comment ID

59400

Commenting on behalf of

United Soils Management Limited

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Comments are from experience in operating a fill site at a former sand and gravel pit: 1. Site soil should be used to establish grade above the water table, before excess soil is imported. Read more

Comment ID

59417

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Regarding the Best Management Practices for Aggregate Pit and Quarry Rehabilitation document (page 18), can material that meets Tables 2.1 and 3.1 for properties with potable and non-potable water respectively be brought (and placed above the water table) to ARA licensed properties without amending Read more