Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

110252

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The primary problem causing congestion on Toronto streets is construction. Removing bike lanes on major streets will of necessity create new construction sites on those streets. Read more

Comment ID

110253

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Say goodbye to all on street parking. If this bill passes I will be supporting a lawsuit to remove targeting of cyclists, the language is discriminatory and should phrasing targeting one portion of the population. In doing so all on street parking will be removed.

Comment ID

110255

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Good grief, this is a completely unserious bill. Our transportation minister and premier need to take a basic transportation planning class. If everyone is forced to drive around in cars, congestion will be WORSE. Read more

Comment ID

110256

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Your decision to remove bike lanes will make it even more dangerous to cycle here in Toronto than it is now. I use the bike path on Bloor almost daily. Even with this bike path I have been involved in numerous close calls involving dooring incidents, being cut off and aggressive drivers. Read more

Comment ID

110257

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I live near the Yonge St bike lanes. When these were installed, there was public meeting where the proposal was outlined --the work the city planners had done in making the proposal was extensive. They looked at traffic patterns on parallel streets---Avenue Road and Mount Pleasant. Read more

Comment ID

110258

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
At this moment, we need more green initiative than ever. Bike lanes coverage should be expanded, not reduced, and we should be focusing on public transit infrastructure and culture that means less cars on the road, and more mobility across economic divides. Read more

Comment ID

110259

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Biking can lead to many accidents, especially in downtown areas of a city. In Toronto, for example, I've seen many bicyclers weave in and out of traffic; many time they've almost caused accidents. Read more

Comment ID

110260

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Judges are required for unbiased arbitration. Those having their property expropriated are suffering enough - they deserve fair market value for their homes and appealing to the MTO will not deliver that to them. MTO is biased and motivated to pay as little as possible. It’s a conflict of interest. Read more

Comment ID

110261

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly disagree with the removal of bike lanes on Bloor, Young and University Avenue. These roads have historically always suffered from poor traffic unrelated to the cycling infrastructure. Read more

Comment ID

110262

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is about time that the willful, expensive vandalism of our public roads was stopped. I live in Etobicoke, and the halving of Bloor Street's lanes has made my daily commute a nightmare. Read more

Comment ID

110263

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It's so concerning that the MTO will decide fair value of homes. It's even more concerning that cities won't be deciding their own public transportation networks, especially for bikes. Read more

Comment ID

110264

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
this is a bad idea. this is overstep by the provincial govt. when traffic and gridlock are not positively affected by the removal of bike lanes what will the response be? when a cyclist is injured or killed on a roadway due to the removal of bike lanes what will the response be? Read more

Comment ID

110270

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Bike lanes are a necessity in the city for so many different users - especially on the main streets where so many shops are located. This is how many people get around safely to purchase groceries and all other necessities from small shops - city living! Read more

Comment ID

110271

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am strongly opposed to this policy for the following reasons. - increasing vehicle lanes is not a long term solution to congestion - removing recent bike lanes is a waste of public money Read more

Comment ID

110274

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a terrible mistake. Time and time again studies from around the world have shown that bike lanes reduce traffic and make our roads safer. Doug Ford is pandering to suburban voters who's car ownership cyclists continue to subsidize, instead of using evidence based decision making. Read more

Comment ID

110275

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am against Ontario Bill 212 (Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024) for several critical reasons. The proposal to remove bike lanes as a means of reducing traffic congestion is fundamentally flawed and unsupported by evidence. Read more

Comment ID

110277

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Spending additional money to undo government work is a poor use of funds at best. Furthermore those funds come from communities across the province and are all directed towards a single city, without conclusive evidence that the actions taken will actually alleviate traffic. It is ridiculous. Read more