I don’t like this proposal. Many studies have shown that adding bike lanes reduces car traffic and congestion, and adding more lanes to cities would not make cars move faster unless there were no traffic lights.
Read more
There is absolutely no research that shows reducing bike lanes will be a positive improvement for traffic. Actually all research shows the opposite.
Read more
I am concerned that this will restrict municipalities on the control that they have over their own jurisdiction. This will also add a new barrier for creating bike lanes which are a really important alternative to driving.
Read more
We need infrastructure to support alternative forms of transportation to replace cars. Bike lanes are not creating traffic, cars create traffic. There are many other things that are creating traffic, such as left turns and parking on major streets.
Read more
I am a daily bike lane user. I ride to work every day. It has changed my life, I've lost 20lbs, my commute has been cut in half. If bike lanes are removed, I will still ride my bike. I will slow down traffic, I will cause congestion.
Read more
This is such a terrible idea.
First: The province should not tell Cities on what they can or cannot do with bike lanes
Second: How will this help congestion, adding one lane on any road will just lead to more cars on the road.
Read more
Please do not do this. It will waste provincial taxpayer money for a municipal project, increase cyclist deaths and injuries, and make traffic worse, NOT better.
I strongly oppose Bill 212. Passing this legislation will (a)not alleviate traffic congestion, (b)will lead to more injuries and deaths, (c)encroaches on the autonomy of municipalities, and (d)leads to more bloated and less effective governance.
Read more
I appreciate the government's efforts to reduce gridlock and prioritize efficient transportation. However, the proposal requiring municipalities to seek provincial approval for bike lanes that remove a traffic lane seems to overlook the benefits of dedicated cycling infrastructure.
Read more
As a taxpayer who cycles in the city to get around, I am imploring this government to prioritize their residents’ safety. Simply put, bike lanes save lives. Studies from around the world show bike lanes ease congestion, reduce emissions and are a boon to business.
Read more
Long overdue to eliminate bike lanes on major streets. Cities in Canada have much more cold weather and people here use cars more than most cities in the world. Bike Lanes should be on tertiary arteries and not on major streets like Yonge St, Bloor St and University.
Read more
The bike lines are a vital safety measure for cyclists who for various reasons (economic, environmental, health) choose to bike rather than drive. Ultimately city building is about compromise, and no one is saying cars don’t have a place in Toronto.
Read more
A completely asinine and half baked idea meant solely to pander to Ford's political base. Cyclists have a right to be safe on the roads and removing bike lanes to create more lanes for cars will have zero effect on reducing gridlock.
Read more
As a cyclist, I oppose the new regulation allowing the province to remove bike lanes because it undermines safety and accessibility for those of us who rely on cycling as a primary mode of transport.
Read more
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
I don’t like this proposal…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102737
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
There is absolutely no…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102738
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
If any bike lanes are…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102739
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am concerned that this…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102740
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
We need infrastructure to…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102741
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Bike lanes provide an…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102742
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am a driver, and a cyclist…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102743
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I am a daily bike lane user…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102744
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I only bike in Toronto…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102745
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Removing bike lanes makes…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102747
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This is such a terrible idea…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102749
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Please do not do this. It…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102750
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I strongly oppose Bill 212…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102751
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I appreciate the government…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102752
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
As a taxpayer who cycles in…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102753
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Long overdue to eliminate…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102754
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Subject: Closing Loopholes…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102755
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The bike lines are a vital…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102757
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
A completely asinine and…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102758
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
As a cyclist, I oppose the…
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
Comment ID
102759
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions