Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

175093

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am strongly opposed to shrinking 36 Conservation Authorities to 7. This means we would lose local expertise, and hands-on, daily monitoring to protect our widely varied watersheds, our drinking water, and our flood protections. Read more

Comment ID

175105

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Keep Conservation Local – Local conservation staff and offices understand the water, land, people, and challenges of the Upper Thames River watershed in ways centralized decision-makers cannot. Read more

Comment ID

175107

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Since you're updating you have the Niagara River listed under the Eastern Lake Ontario Regional CA - obviously incorrect. Within the description for the Eastern Lake Ontario Regional CA you note the 'Cataraqui system', yet the Cataraqui Region CA is mapped in with the St. Lawrence Regional CA. Read more

Comment ID

175112

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is my hope that the government can see the importance of maintaining conservation land and the funding that is greatly required to support the current environmental protection that the 36 conservation authorities provide. Read more

Comment ID

175114

Commenting on behalf of

Village of Point Edward

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Good morning. Please find attached a letter from the Village of Point Edward outlining our concerns with the plan to consolidate Ontario’s Conservation Authorities. We thank you for taking the time to consider our input. Jim Burns Chief Administrative Officer/Clerk Read more

Comment ID

175122

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly oppose the proposed consolidation of Ontario’s Conservation Authorities. - Current collaboration and communication systems work well; restructuring will add unnecessary complexity and costs without clear benefits. Read more

Comment ID

175129

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
To is it may concern: I disagree with the joining of the Lake Superior Conservation Authority with the Huron Conservation Authority. They are two distinct areas and are miles apart. The LSCA covers a vast area in and around Read more

Comment ID

175130

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There are many different environments within southern Ontario alone and different things impact them, and I worry that consolidating into only 7 regions will make it so that local knowledge is lost and action will be too slow when things need to be done.

Comment ID

175131

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
How can anyone who can read a map include the Lakehead Conservation Authority with one near Lake Huron. This is another sample of southern Ontario bureaucrats trying to change things they know nothing about. Maybe YOU should consult with a local MPP. Read more

Comment ID

175132

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The amalgamation of the 36 into 7 would be a serious mistake. The geography, watershed challenges and technical gaps cannot be effectively addressed by such expansive consolidations. Some limited amalgamations ( for a few small under funded and under staffed CAs) might make sense. Read more