Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

181824

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The economic and viability case for these MZOs and this project has collapsed. The condominium market has both collapsed and shifted, with the market no longer supporting high rise projects dominated by studios and one-bedroom units, which is the configuration this TOC proposes. Read more

Comment ID

181825

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs represent a profound override of local democracy despite Oakville’s full compliance with provincial policies and proven track record of growth and housing development. Read more

Comment ID

181826

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It does not look like any thought has been given to the following: South Oakville is bound on the north by QEW on the south by Lake Ontario and west by a River. Read more

Comment ID

181827

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Read more

Comment ID

181828

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Read more

Comment ID

181830

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Read more

Comment ID

181831

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Read more

Comment ID

181836

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The TOC provincial plan for Oakville is a terrible one. The infrastructure cannot support it. Also, it does not in any way provide decent housing for families with children. The Oakville plan is a much better choice. MZO’s should not be allowed in this instance. Let Oakville decide its own future.

Comment ID

181837

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Read more

Comment ID

181838

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs represent a profound override of local democracy despite Oakville’s full compliance with provincial policies and proven track record of growth and housing development. Read more

Comment ID

181840

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Read more

Comment ID

181841

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Mr Ford, It is very disturbing to see how the views of Oakville citizens are discarded by our provincial government. I think we know what is best for our town and community and have been submitting our alternative ideas to no avail. Read more

Comment ID

181844

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This Transit-Oriented Community (TOC) fails to comply with Premier Ford’s Build Homes Faster agenda and will not deliver a single home before 2031, the Province’s own housing deadline, and will take 25 years to complete. OPA70 is a better alternative and is ready to go. Read more

Comment ID

181845

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These MZOs would force extreme and reckless density on Midtown, more than double that of any comparable development in the GTA, without the infrastructure to support it; creating chaos and overwhelming transportation and services that are already overstressed, including local roads, transit, the GO Read more