Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

40085

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please ensure manuals use best science to protect larger animals such as wolves and caribou https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2019/12/09/wood-surplus-shows-theres-room-for-the-forestry-industry-and-caribou.html

Comment ID

40223

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
To successfully implement the four pillars of the Ontario Government’s Forest Strategy, the government needs to rely more heavily on competent and accountable forest professionals (RPFs). Read more

Comment ID

40286

Commenting on behalf of

Domtar Inc, Dryden Pulpmill

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Thank you for providing the opportunity to comment. The proposed changes support the forest industry, enable better public consultation, and do not compromise consideration and protection of the forest environment. Read more

Comment ID

40563

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Professional Foresters Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
To successfully implement the four pillars of the Ontario Government’s Forest Strategy and protect the broader public interest, the government will need to rely more heavily on competent and accountable forest professionals. Read more

Comment ID

41378

Commenting on behalf of

Westwind Forest Stewardship Inc.

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As a summary to submitted letter with more details, I am very supportive of the proposal. It will help alleviate outdated and redundant requirements that add little to successfully ensuring forestry-related activities and consultation are occurring in an effective manner. Read more

Comment ID

41476

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
To successfully implement the four pillars of the Ontario Government’s Forest Strategy and protect the broader public interest, the government will need to rely more heavily on competent and accountable forest professionals. Read more

Comment ID

41662

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
item 1: propose to reduce time on Long term Management Direction ........................... OK item 2: remove requjirement for LCC to provide statement with draft FMP ............. no. retain as is Read more

Comment ID

42837

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
After careful review of the A Blueprint for Success: Ontario’s Forest Sector Strategy DRAFT and the proposed revisions to the Forest Manuals regulated under the Crown Forest Sustainability Act, the members of the Red Lake LCC do have a few items of concern that they would like to voice for consider Read more

Comment ID

44182

Commenting on behalf of

Clergue Forest Management Inc.

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I fully support eliminating the requirement of the mid-plan check for forest management plans. As the proposal sensibly points out, plans can be amended at any time to incorporate new policy direction, as happened recently with the revised protocol for water crossing installations. Read more

Comment ID

44818

Commenting on behalf of

Nature & Outdoor Tourism Ontario (NOTO)

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On behalf of the Resource-Based Tourism Industry, Nature and Outdoor Tourism Ontario (NOTO) has some concerns with the proposed revisions to the Forest Manuals. Read more

Comment ID

45158

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
In General I am in support of the direction that these revisions in this proposal. The reduction in duplication and red tape is a welcome change. The time and resources need to be dedicated to the teams revising the manuals and guides. Read more