Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

38003

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Under the Proposal Details, in Part B. 1. the document states that "The QP has confirmed and documented evidence from the Phase One ESA that the site restrictions in A, do not apply to the RSC property" This should be revised to state that Read more

Comment ID

40099

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hello, If we have learned anything over the last few years it is to be sure there are stringent rules in place to guard our air, land in water. What ever happens to one happens to the other automatically. Read more

Comment ID

40124

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Can the Ministry provide further explanation of B (4) (2); - Concluding that there would not be an impact to ground water such that it would adversely affect the intended property use of the RSC property. The application of this clause is not understood. Thanks.

Comment ID

40126

Commenting on behalf of

Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Water Services Division, Hydrogeology & Source Water

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
RESPONSE TO ERO 019-0987 “Amendment to the Record Of Site Condition (Brownfields) Regulation related to the Requirement to Sample Ground Water” Read more

Comment ID

40127

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Environment Industry Association (ONEIA)

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please find attached the response of the Ontario Environment Industry Association (ONEIA) to ERO posting 019-0987. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact us directly. Read more

Comment ID

40128

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Response to: ERO number 019-0987 Notice type Regulation Act Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990 Posted by Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Notice stage Proposal Proposal posted December 9, 2019 Comment period December 9, 2019 - January 13, 2020 (35 days) Read more

Comment ID

40139

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
• “garage” should be added to O.Reg. 153/04, Schedule D Phase one environmental site assessments, Table 2 Potentially Contaminating Activities. This would allow QP’s to flag this land use as a PCA that leads to an APEC. Read more

Comment ID

40143

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Society of Professional Engineers

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
January 13, 2020 RE: ERO 019 – 0987: Amendment to the Record of Site Condition (Brownfields) Regulation related to the Requirement to Sample Ground Water Read more

Comment ID

40147

Commenting on behalf of

The City of Guelph

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The City of Guelph (the City) is pleased to comment on the Government of Ontario’s Proposal to Amend the Record of Site Condition (Brownfields) Regulation related to the Requirement to Sampling of Groundwater. Comments from the City of Guelph Read more

Comment ID

40148

Commenting on behalf of

Toronto Water, City of Toronto

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1. Based on the information provided in the Environment Registry of Ontario, I understand that the proposed amendment will only be applicable under the condition where the groundwater table is below the zone of contaminated soil. Read more

Comment ID

40149

Commenting on behalf of

City of Barrie

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1) It is unclear how the QP will demonstrate that contaminants have not migrated from soil into groundwater at concentrations in exceedance of applicable standards. 2) The regulation does not appear to address contaminants that have migrated offsite. Read more