The background information provided for the proposed Construction Site Dewatering exemption indicates the following: "Under the requirements of the proposed exemption, proponents would be required to implement any necessary measures to ensure that water quantity and quality are not affected upstream
Read more
This proposal affects foundation drainage works, which are a huge source of I/I in sewers. The geotechnical folks who submit for PTTWs know nothing about sewers. Taking away this regulatory step represents increasing the risk of I/I and should not be taken lightly.
Read more
These initiatives are practical in my opinion. I believe each of these to have minimal potential for negative impact or consequence and appreciate the consideration to shift focus to where it should be. I am fully supportive of this.
"The ministry would maintain the authority to inspect the sewage works and ensure compliance with all legislative and regulatory requirements and to ensure that the works do not pose an adverse impact."
Read more
2.0 Foundation Drainage Works
If a site is taking and treating less than 50,000 L/day of foundation drainage for discharge to a storm sewer and a PTTW is not required, will an ECA still be required?
4.0 Construction Site Dewatering
Read more
Oxford County’s Engineering Services and Water & Wastewater Services are both in agreement and support the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks consideration for removing the requirement to obtain an ECA for construction site dewatering.
Read more
I disagree strongly with this proposal. Ontario should not be removing safeguards that protect our water quality. Developers and construction should not be exempt from ECAs.
In the goal to allow businesses to begin operations and infrastructure projects faster while ensuring that environmental protection is maintained by exempting low-risk sewage works, guidelines should be put into place to determine what low-risk sewage works are.
Read more
The Corporation of the City of Barrie's Environmental Compliance Unit and Risk Management Unit (City) has reviewed the ERO proposal and has the following comments to be taken into consideration regarding the proposed amendment:
Read more
The City of Guelph appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed amendment to exempt certain low risk sewage works from requiring an Environmental Compliance Approval given that these proposed changes would reduce regulatory burden while ensuring ongoing environmental protections.
Read more
On behalf of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, please find attached our submission with respect to ERO # 019-4456 (Amendments to exempt low risk sewage works from requiring an Environmental Compliance Approval). Thank you.
Read more
Please find attached Conservation Ontario's comments on “Amendments to exempt low risk sewage works from requiring an Environmental Compliance Approval" (ERO#019-4456).
Conservation Ontario thanks the Province for the opportunity to provide feedback on this proposal.
Read more
- The removal of the requirement to obtain an ECA for low impact development works located on single private residences and foundation drainage works will help Growth Management on Site applications.
- Further definitions needed for terms Single Lot, Parcel of Land and Industrial Land.
Read more
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
The background information…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
58620
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Good morning, Culverts/catch…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
58621
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
This proposal affects…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
58622
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
These initiatives are…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
58630
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
"The ministry would maintain…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
58643
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
2.0 Foundation Drainage…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
58688
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Oxford County’s Engineering…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
58689
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
I disagree strongly with…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
58815
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
In the goal to allow…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
58875
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The Corporation of the City…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
58975
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Find attached OHBA's…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
59014
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
From Toronto Water…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
59015
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
The City of Guelph…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
59017
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
On behalf of the Ontario…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
59019
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Please find attached…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
59024
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
Clarification is required…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
59025
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions
- The removal of the…
Comment on
Streamlining Low-Risk sewage project approvals
Comment ID
59030
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Related actions