Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment on

St. Marys Cement Inc. (Canada) - Issuance of a licence to remove over 20,000 tonnes of aggregate annually from a pit or a quarry

Comment ID

61234

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The site is surrounded by residents who participate in CLTIP. Conservation Lands Tax Incentive Program. These residents were approached by CLTIP due to their meeting eligibility requirements. The site exists within a Natural Heritage Area. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

St. Marys Cement Inc. (Canada) - Issuance of a licence to remove over 20,000 tonnes of aggregate annually from a pit or a quarry

Comment ID

61238

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Comment 2: The Environmental Impact on Wildlife. The proponents planning justification report concludes - No negative impacts to significant natural features and functions on the site or adjacent lands. (2(a) page 13 - PPS.) Read more

Related actions

Comment on

St. Marys Cement Inc. (Canada) - Issuance of a licence to remove over 20,000 tonnes of aggregate annually from a pit or a quarry

Comment ID

61239

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly oppose this proposed pit addition on a present RU zoned farmland acreage across the road directly from my property which is adjacent to the Beaver River Class A Wetlands along which I have my property & residence also. Read more

Related actions

Comment on

St. Marys Cement Inc. (Canada) - Issuance of a licence to remove over 20,000 tonnes of aggregate annually from a pit or a quarry

Comment ID

61241

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Comment #3: The land proposed for aggregate extraction is the winter/spring source of food for White Tailed Deer and possible movement corridor for other animal species. Read more

Related actions