Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

72017

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The bill has already had a third reading (today November 23). It is not acceptable that it is still proceeding during the commenting period! changes still must be made to this legislation. I have serious concerns about the sweeping changes. Read more

Comment ID

72040

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Saving our Greenbelt especially during times of climate change and flooding seems irresponsible and a reversal on promises made. There are many ways to increase housing in responsible ways. This is not it.

Comment ID

72079

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The bill to change development charges will have an effect on my future employment. The municipality in which I work for pays for my salary using Development Charges. Slashing these charges will change operating and capital budgets for the foreseeable future. Read more

Comment ID

72087

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Shared Path Consultation Initiative 720 Bathurst St., Suite 321 CSI Annex, Toronto, ON M5S 2R4 admin@sharedpath.ca | www.sharedpath.ca Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 777 Bay Street, 17th Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 2J3 November 23rd, 2022 Dear Minister Clark, Read more

Comment ID

72096

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Several of the proposed changes to the Planning Act and City of Toronto Act are commendable. For example, higher density around transit stations makes good sense. But many other aspects of the proposal are problematic. In particular, the proposed changes would: Read more

Comment ID

72154

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing to express my opposition to Bill 23 and associated policy proposals that would weaken environmental protections and undermine public involvement in land use planning and decision-making. I am particularly concerned about the: Read more

Comment ID

72221

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This act is concerning due to its environmental impact. Citizens are paying attention and this is not a worthwhile solution. The conservative proposal brings undue environmental harm and we are insisting that the government adopt the far cleaner development options that exist. Read more

Comment ID

72289

Commenting on behalf of

Corporation of the Town of Tecumseh

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Council of the Town of Tecumseh, at its regular meeting held Tuesday, November 22, 2022, gave consideration to Report DS-2022-44 entitled Bill 23 – More Home Built Faster Act, 2022, Summary Report from the Director Development Services. A copy of this report has been attached. Read more

Comment ID

72299

Commenting on behalf of

Corporation of the Town of Tecumseh

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Council of the Town of Tecumseh, at its regular meeting held Tuesday, November 22, 2022, gave consideration to Report DS-2022-44 entitled Bill 23 – More Home Built Faster Act, 2022, Summary Report from the Director Development Services. A copy of this report has been attached. Read more

Comment ID

72369

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I have attached a letter outlining the submissions of my client, Saugeen Ojibway Nation, regarding the proposed Planning Act and City of Toronto Act changes (being Schedules 9 and 1 of Bill 23). Read more

Comment ID

72394

Commenting on behalf of

Municipality of Strathroy-Caradoc

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Municipality of Strathroy-Caradoc is greatly concerned by the proposed changes to the Planning Act. We have submitted a letter detailing our concerns. Read more