Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

68311

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We have lived within the greenbelt since I was a child. We have watched development sprawl. Sometimes to the benefit of our communities, sometimes with serious consequences (and driven only with the interest of $$$) . We have watched the populations of song birds change and dwindle. Read more

Comment ID

68320

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Seriously… keep your money hungry hands off our greenbelt. This is a very slippery slope and soon we will not have a Greenbelt at all. The land in the Greenbelt is protected for a reason and the wildlife that lives there depends on it - our ecosystems depend on it.

Comment ID

68321

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please do not develop any sections of the green belt in the way proposed. The climate change crisis is real. Former governments created the green belt as a way to protect fragile ecosystems which protect us all. This isn’t your land to develop. Read more

Comment ID

68327

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The reduction of protections for our Greenbelt is a mistake which will impact many generations to come. This should not be allowed. Please consider our childrens’ futures above short sighted development plans which are poised to benefit only the already wealthy.

Comment ID

68328

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Removing designated lands is unacceptable - particularly given the density that they are adjacent to. We don’t need more sprawl in Ontario. We need more vertical. We’ve already scene a decrease in wildlife and air quality, critical habitat is important. Read more

Comment ID

68331

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hi, why is this even being considered, we need this land for food not more housing, we will not be able to support the growing population by doing this. This is concerning to me, we should focus on high density areas and better transit, not ruining something so sacred as our food supply. Read more

Comment ID

68336

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Do not allow Doug Ford to destroy the greenbelt. This was, and always should remain, protected lands. No development should be allowed. It will cause environmental issues for decades. It is our duty to protect these lands for the sake of our children’s future. Read more

Comment ID

68342

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am against re-classifying any of the Greenbelt for housing or other development. It would cost Ontario tax payers less, and preserve their natural heritage, to use land already inside urban areas that is already zoned for residential development. There is sufficient of such land available. Read more