Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

70262

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Building on the Oak Ridges Moraine would be a disaster. We’ve seen what climate change has already done to our province. The people of this province require the lands to remain protected. We deserve green space. We deserve access to locally grown food. Read more

Comment ID

70268

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal is an absolute disrespect and disregard for our Country. This land is protected area for a reason! It protects animals, ecosystems, and current homes from being compromised by spring snow drainage and rain fall. Read more

Comment ID

70423

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
There is absolutely no need to change the size or shape of the greenbelt. There is plenty of land already designated for development to accommodate the 1.5 million homes target. We need to stop sprawl. Instead increase density in existing urban areas. Read more

Comment ID

70668

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is environmentally protected land. The Conservatives promised they would not tough the green space. Yes, we need more housing but the reasons why we don't have enough housing has nothing to do with needing this space. Read more

Comment ID

70716

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Leave the existing ORMCP intact because the ORM provides essential ecological services, in terms of water and flood control (wetland services) and oxygen production/CO2 sequestration due to the presence of forests. Did you notice the two letters, CP, stand for conservation plan? Read more

Comment ID

70719

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hello We should not make changes to the Greenbelt lands. It needs to stay as it is because it would disrupt water pathways, and possibly contaminate downstream water if the head of the waterway is taken and built upon. Read more