Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

83769

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
We ask that the province ensure it specifies this does not apply to light rail stations and lines being built in the Ottawa area. We understand it to pertain to conventional railway lines and tracks.

Comment ID

83863

Commenting on behalf of

Urban Insights

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposed legislative reform will help accelerate missing-middle housing which has a lower construction price point than high-density housing, can be built faster, and, provides greater housing options (eg. unit sizes at a lower cost). Read more

Comment ID

84032

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I think that it is important that development is focused on more than just housing. We need to make sure that we are developing communities, making sure that we don't have the urban sprawl that makes living difficult. Public transit must be easily available and accessible. Read more

Comment ID

84122

Commenting on behalf of

Friends of the Tay Watershed Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Friends of the Tay Watershed Association submitted comments on Bill 23 expressing concern about the elimination of site plan control to waterfront residential development of 10 units or less. Read more

Comment ID

84912

Commenting on behalf of

City of Mississauga

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Environmental Registry of Ontario (“ERO”) posting 019-6822 regarding Site Plan for Residential Developments of 10 or Fewer Units – Two Proposed new Minister’s Regulations under the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006. Read more

Comment ID

84978

Commenting on behalf of

Regional Municipality of Peel

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Environmental Registry of Ontario (ERO) postings regarding Bill 97, Helping Homebuyers and Protecting Tenants Act (the Bill). Read more

Comment ID

85850

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is so transparent at this point to all Canadians especially those in the GTA that the Ministry of Housing and Steve Clark have no interest in the livelihoods of those who don't line his pockets. Read more

Comment ID

86645

Commenting on behalf of

Township of Muskoka Lakes

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Township of Muskoka Lakes Planning Committee recommended that the attached covering report and joint submission be submitted as the comments on this proposal from the Township of Muskoka Lakes. Read more

Comment ID

88300

Commenting on behalf of

Our Muskoka Stakeholders Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Dear Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing,   The Our Muskoka Stakeholders Association has reviewed the proposed Bill 97: the proposed Housing Homebuyers, Protecting Tenants Act, 2023, alongside Bill 23. Read more

Comment ID

88653

Commenting on behalf of

City of Markham

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Kindly find attached Markham Council's Resolution and the City's comments on Bill 97 and the Associated Registry Postings. Read more

Comment ID

89448

Commenting on behalf of

Conservation Ontario

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please find attached Conservation Ontario's comments on “Site Plan for Residential Developments of 10 or Fewer Units – Two Proposed new Minister’s Regulations under the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006” (ERO #019-6822). Read more

Comment ID

90776

Commenting on behalf of

Greater Ottawa Home Builders' Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please accept the attached from the Greater Ottawa Home Builders’ Association (GOHBA) and its members as a submission to the government’s request for feedback on ‘Future Regulations To Create A Balanced Framework Around Municipal Rental Replacement By-Laws’ (23-MMAH005). Read more

Comment ID

90777

Commenting on behalf of

Greater Ottawa Home Builders' Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please accept the attached from the Greater Ottawa Home Builders’ Association (GOHBA) and its members as a submission to the government’s request for feedback on ‘Site Plan for Residential Developments of 10 or Fewer Units’ (ERO 019-6822). Read more

Comment ID

90785

Commenting on behalf of

Township of West Lincoln

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On May 8th, 2023, the Township of West Lincoln Planning, Building and Environment Committee supported the following comments with respect to this proposed regulation. Read more

Comment ID

90788

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On behalf of TransCanada PipeLines Ltd. (TCPL), please see attached letter in response to the proposed new regulations for site plan control through Bill 97. Read more