Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

94589

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a bad municipal decision built upon a bad provincial decision. Once again, this smells like it benefits developers rather than the citizens of Ontario and the staff of the Town of Grimsby look like they're not interested in what their taxpayers think. Read more

Comment ID

94596

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Ontarions want full protection for the Greenbelt. This protection must be permanent. In addition, Ontarions also want to see the following actions: 1) legislate that the 10 year Greenbelt Reviews can only add lands to the Greenbelt with no land removals or land swaps, Read more

Comment ID

94606

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Greenbelt lands should be returned to the greenbelt and all protections previous to 2022 restored. The health of our Province's food supply and healthy ecosystems depends on a strong greenbelt to prevent unchecked urban sprawl.

Comment ID

94609

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I do not support the staff report supporting the two properties are not returned to the greenbelt but allowed to be developed. Keep the boundaries firm. Do not allow politics especially the short sighted town of Grimsby to redraw boundaries. Keep the greenbelt as is.

Comment ID

94626

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a fourth generation resident of the Town of Grimsby. I feel compelled to express my disappointment with the Town of Grimsby Council's plan to recommend the removal of the Cline and Winston Road lands from Greenbelt protection to "open up land for development". Read more

Comment ID

94628

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Not only legislation to give back the stolen public properties, to enhance all protected lands to illegal to sell by any political party . No one on this planet can buy or sell protected lands. Read more

Comment ID

94629

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
November 19, 2023 Hello Premier Doug Ford, Why is our farm so popular, it seems that a lot of people want to have a say about our property and will not except the opinion of the people living on the actual property? We do support the decision to put our land back in the Greenbelt. Read more

Comment ID

94631

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Reverse boundary changes to prohibit and reduction in protected lands. Create legislation that would make this impossible to try again and prevent the wasted time and resources that would include. Make it so it is a non option ever!!

Comment ID

94636

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
These lands must be returned to the Greenbelt and it must be protected so that this kind of corruption does not happen again. Wetlands, watersheds, prime farmland, habitat, and natural heritage need stronger protection! Read more

Comment ID

94652

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I think the Greenbelt itself is a complete sham and waste of time. If the population is to keep growing by bringing in immigrants as politicians want, then they have to build houses somewhere. That can not be achieved with just simply densification. Read more