Comments

These lands are EMPLOYMENT LANDS in a strictly EMPLOYMENT AREA. Employment lands are to be protected and such was stated in the JUST RELEASED Provincial Policy Statement 2024 and per Stouffville Official Plan. Read more

At other Campus of Cares, specifically Mon Sheong Foundation's other campus of care e.g. Markham, there is no inclusion of "Apartment Use". Why do they need "Apartment Use" here? They are already zoned for long-term care and seniors care facilities. Is there something else going on here? Read more

My concerns with the MZO under ERO 019-9394 requested by Mon Sheong Foundation located at 162-176 Sandiford Drive. Stouffville is in desperate need of employment land and the taxes and jobs that it creates. Read more

I have concerns with the MZO under ERO 019-9394 requested by Mon Sheong Foundation located at 162-176 Sandiford Drive. Listed below are my reasons why this MZO should be refused Read more

In the end, if the market can justify such intensification as the MZO would allow, I don't actually take any huge issue with the level of density being discussed nor do I care about the proposed parking rate. We certainly need the housing. Read more

As a Stouffville resident, I have experienced developers pushing the envelope along with heights and set backs that impede on neighboring lots and do not complement the vision or characteristic that Stouffville has to offer. Read more