Commentaire
I strongly opposed this proposed legislation. It is shortsighted and dangerous, and will put lives at risk by removing/preventing essential safe cycling infrastructure. It is extremely misleading to claim that this bill will reduce gridlock, as study after study shows that adding bike lanes reduces traffic congestion. There are few, if any, studies that I indicate the opposite, so it appears this government does not rely on research or fact when establishing policies. Furthermore, this bill would reduce municipal autonomy and override local decisionmaking, which is antithetical to this government and the Premier's previously stated priorities, as evidenced in past legislation ie. "strong mayor" powers. Why has the Premier flip-flopped on this? One can only conclude that this anti-cycling rhetoric is being employed to distract the public from the fact that this bill would also reduce property owners' appeal rights with regard to expropriations. This proposed legislation is unconscionable, and even this government, which has a poor track record, should be ashamed.
Supporting documents
Soumis le 25 octobre 2024 6:31 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps – Loi de 2024 sur la construction plus rapide de voies publiques
Numéro du REO
019-9265
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
106614
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire