Commentaire
As a supporter of the Ford government, I appreciate its commitment to improving Ontario’s infrastructure and addressing congestion challenges. However, as an ICU healthcare worker who, along with my partner, relies on Toronto’s bike lanes for our daily commute to Mount Sinai Hospital, I am concerned that Bill 212 may not achieve these goals as effectively as intended. Without a car, we depend on bike lanes as an efficient and safe way to reach our essential roles at work.
Removing key bike lanes on main routes like Bloor, Yonge, and University will push cyclists into shared lanes with cars, which could inadvertently create more congestion and risk for everyone on the road. Imagine the frustration of driving behind a cyclist on a backed up University Ave, forced to slow down or navigate around them—this situation increases delays and the risk of accidents. Mixing bike and car traffic, rather than separating them, could ultimately work against efforts to reduce congestion by removing a proven, efficient alternative for thousands of city commuters.
Ensuring that bike lanes are available for those who depend on them allows roads to operate more smoothly, with safer, separated routes that keep everyone moving. A balanced transportation policy that incorporates well-planned bike infrastructure supports personal freedom, public safety, and efficient commuting—all key elements of a strong urban economy.
I respectfully urge decision-makers to reconsider the restrictive measures in Bill 212 and instead support a balanced approach to urban infrastructure that keeps Ontario’s roads both efficient and safe for all residents.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Soumis le 2 novembre 2024 5:06 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps – Loi de 2024 sur la construction plus rapide de voies publiques
Numéro du REO
019-9265
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
111339
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire