Commentaire
Hi,
I would like to voice my thoughts on bill 212, and why I think it is a bad idea, reversing progress made over the last decade.
1. The provincial government shouldn’t be adding red tape to local governments trying to improve transportation inside their community.
2. I, as well as many of my friends and family use bike lanes daily. I consider them to be essential for my daily life, much like sidewalks and roads
3. Safety of cyclists is important, and we can help by adding visual, and physical barricades to ensure cyclist safety.
4. Students. Highschool, college, and middle school students as well as seniors, often commute by bicycle due to the lower cost opposed to driving. By reducing bike lanes, we are directly putting these groups at risk unnecessarily.
5. As a driver, I would much rather cyclists be in designated areas so they don’t have to be navigated around the road way. Without bike lanes, cyclist will inevitably end up using roads, and sidewalks (which should be legal when bike lanes are absent), this creates danger for drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians.
6. By having bike lanes connect to transit stations, we can reduce the number of cars on the road. This would reduce gridlock more effectively than adding more lanes.
In conclusion, I think bike infrastructure is absolutely essential to any urban landscape to diversify commute options for the community.
Soumis le 16 novembre 2024 12:29 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps – Loi de 2024 sur la construction plus rapide de voies publiques
Numéro du REO
019-9265
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
116311
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire