Commentaire
As a cyclist who frequently uses bike lanes in Ontario, especially in Toronto, I have to express my disagreement with the proposed "Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024" and "Building Highways Faster Act, 2024." While I understand the need to improve traffic flow and reduce gridlock, the emphasis on expanding highways like Highway 413, the Bradford Bypass, and the Garden City Skyway seems to overlook the growing need for more sustainable transportation options.
Ontario's cities, particularly Toronto, have seen a significant increase in the number of cyclists on the road, and I feel safe riding on bike lanes that are often placed alongside highways and major roads. The proposal to expedite highway construction and expropriate properties to make room for these projects raises concerns about potential impacts on local communities and, importantly, on cyclists' safety.
Expanding highways could lead to increased traffic and pollution, ultimately undermining efforts to encourage greener modes of transportation, like cycling. Moreover, if infrastructure planning continues to prioritize cars over alternative transportation methods, it could make our cities less bike-friendly, thus negatively impacting the safety and well-being of cyclists.
I believe that while highway construction projects are important, they should not come at the expense of alternative transport solutions that are better for the environment and public health. A more balanced approach that includes investments in cycling infrastructure, alongside improvements to highways, would be more beneficial to all Ontarians in the long term.
Soumis le 17 novembre 2024 1:43 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps – Loi de 2024 sur la construction plus rapide de voies publiques
Numéro du REO
019-9265
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
116564
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire