Commentaire
Hi,
As a resident of Mississauga, I strongly oppose Bill 212. Municipalities across Ontario have invested significant resources in developing bicycle lanes, which are increasingly being used by residents, including myself during the summer months. Expanding and improving bicycle infrastructure is vital for several reasons: it promotes health and well-being, provides affordable and sustainable transportation for those who cannot or choose not to own a car, and helps reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
While cities around the world are moving towards prioritizing active transportation, passing Bill 212 would push Ontario in the opposite direction. Focusing solely on highway expansion undermines efforts to create vibrant, livable communities where people can rely on safe, accessible, and eco-friendly transportation options. Instead of doubling down on highway development, we should prioritize infrastructure that encourages active transportation, such as protected bike lanes, pedestrian pathways, and transit-oriented projects.
I urge the government to reconsider this bill and focus on building infrastructure that aligns with global trends and community needs, making Ontario’s cities more sustainable, inclusive, and resilient. I've attached the OPPI's comment on the Bill as it consolidates essential points that I stand by.
Thank you
Liens connexes
Soumis le 20 novembre 2024 5:44 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps – Loi de 2024 sur la construction plus rapide de voies publiques
Numéro du REO
019-9265
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
119320
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire