Commentaire
Thank you for taking the time to read my comments. This bill is just downright silly. There is no factual basis for the conclusion that reducing bike lanes will help reduce gridlock.
If bike lanes are removed, the cyclists will then simply be riding in traffic, which by any thought process would singularly impede the steady flow of traffic. When there is a bike lane, cyclists are safely removed from the flow of automotive traffic, allowing both cars and bikes to move as freely as traffic enables them to.
Beyond the total lack of sound reasoning behind this bill, it is both an obvious infringement on the jurisdiction of municipal governments by Doug Ford and their provincial Conservatives; and a clear case of pandering to morons on social media who have misplaced rage towards cyclists for small inconveniences in their daily lives. Doug Ford has once again proven that they are utterly devoid of any reasoned thought, and singularly thinks of ways they can help their 1 percenter developer friends, and pass idiotic laws intended to get right wing internet trolls riled up. Where's my buck a beer Doug? Oh right that never made any sense.
Sincerely,
An Ontarian that despises Doug Ford
Soumis le 20 novembre 2024 9:14 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps – Loi de 2024 sur la construction plus rapide de voies publiques
Numéro du REO
019-9265
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
119505
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire