Commentaire
There are dire consequences to this Bill from a financial stability, environmental and climate, and mental physical health standpoint. This Bill is not financially sound - undoing capital works like bike lanes and costing almost 2-3 times MORE than it did to put them in. In the midst of a housing and climate crisis, this work would effectively go against all these larger local, provincial, and global challenges.
I do not bike, but I have family and friends that do and I am concerned for their safety when they still have to use a bike to get around (commute, get groceries, pick up kids from childcare) in the midst of car traffic.
Our dollars could be used wisely in other capacities that support the day-to-day lives of all Canadians in a much larger magnitude.
As a professional planner, there is also no evidence in the claims made about reducing gridlock through these plans - the statements made are baseless and do not consider the economics and design implications that many researchers, academics, scientists, and engineers have been reporting on for decades.
Please reconsider the implications of this bill and the attention other areas of investment that deserve.
Soumis le 20 novembre 2024 11:57 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps – Loi de 2024 sur la construction plus rapide de voies publiques
Numéro du REO
019-9265
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
119980
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire