Commentaire
As I reflect on the implications of Bill 212, my heart grows heavy with concern for the safety of our streets. The proposed removal of bike lanes threatens to increase the risk of accidents, placing cyclists and pedestrians in harm's way. It’s disheartening to think that in a city striving for safety, we might disregard the evidence showing that protected lanes lead to fewer injuries. This is particularly concerning to me as a new father and resident of Bloordale that will be directly affected by this dissapointing overreach by our provincial government.
Moreover, this bill seems to turn its back on our commitment to the environment. By prioritizing cars over cycling, we risk deepening our reliance on fossil fuels and increasing emissions. In a time when we should be championing sustainable transportation, this move feels like a step backward, one that could cloud our air and compromise the health of our communities.
The promise of alleviating traffic congestion rings hollow when we consider the reality: removing bike lanes is likely to bring more vehicles onto our roads, worsening the very gridlock we seek to escape. It’s a puzzling contradiction that could drown out the vibrant life of our neighborhoods in a cacophony of engines and horns.
And then there’s the financial cost. This is not just a matter of infrastructure; it’s about investing wisely in our future. Why would we choose to spend so much to undo progress?
Finally, I worry about the autonomy of our municipalities. This bill encroaches on local decision-making, stripping away the power of communities to shape their own transportation networks. Each neighborhood has its unique needs, and it feels unjust to impose one-size-fits-all solutions from above.
In closing, I urge the provincial government to reconsider this path. Let us not forsake safety, environmental stewardship, and community voices for convenience. Together, we can forge a future that embraces all forms of transportation and strikes a fair balance between local resident and commuter needs.
Soumis le 20 novembre 2024 11:52 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
121987
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire