Reduced Protections: A…

Reduced Protections: A registration-first system may result in less oversight and inadequate protection for vulnerable species.

Government Discretion: Allowing the government to modify the protected species list raises concerns about political influence over scientific assessments.

Weakened Habitat Protection: Changing the habitat definition could leave important peripheral habitats unprotected.

Loss of Recovery Planning: Eliminating mandatory recovery plans might hinder effective conservation and monitoring.

Focus on Economic Growth: Prioritizing economic growth could lead to decisions that favor development over species conservation.

Reduced Independent Advice: Disbanding the Advisory Committee may lessen perspective diversity and weaken scientific advice.

Exemptions and Loopholes: Changes may create more loopholes for developers to harm at-risk species and habitats while streamlining approvals.