Commentaire
There should be no removal of the requirements to develop recovery strategies and management plans. The ability to start work before assessment will lead to lack of reporting from developers. The idea of supporting voluntary conservation programs could work but there is not incentive to actually have them happen, so it’s just an empty promise. If there was promised conservation efforts I’d support this, but this is just twisted to seem like species will still be protected.
We are also dealing with crazy amounts of wildlife in urban areas because there has been a lack of planning. The removal will lead to more issues like the increase of coyotes killing pets and putting kids at risk. I understand housing is an issue, but it’s not because of species protection.
Soumis le 10 mai 2025 10:25 PM
Commentaire sur
Modifications provisoires proposées à la Loi de 2007 sur les espèces en voie de disparition et proposition de Loi de 2025 sur la conservation des espèces
Numéro du REO
025-0380
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
139304
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire