Commentaire
I have five major concerns with Bill 5:
It will exempt certain projects from the Environmental Assessment Act, eliminating comprehensive analysis focused on human health and safety;
It weakens the mining oversight of the Mining Act and curtails public consultation;
It creates zones where provincial laws and municipal by-laws wouldn’t apply — including rules that provide for democratic participation;
It weakens protections for endangered species, including by narrowing the definition of ‘dwelling’ and allowing cabinet to ignore science-based proposals to list species-at-risk; and
It doesn’t recognize Indigenous rights in the way that it should at a time of reconciliation, including by not acknowledging the Crown’s Duty to Consult and the principle of free, prior and informed consent outlined in the United Nations declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).
We have legal environmental protections for good reason and allowing these to be dismantled is a risk to human, ecosystem, and economic health.
These legal protections safeguard our environment, human health, democratic rights, and Indigenous rights.
Bill 5 must be withdrawn as it does not find the right balance between economic growth and health, sustainability, democratic rights, and Indigenous rights.
Soumis le 16 mai 2025 9:43 PM
Commentaire sur
Modifications provisoires proposées à la Loi de 2007 sur les espèces en voie de disparition et proposition de Loi de 2025 sur la conservation des espèces
Numéro du REO
025-0380
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
146465
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire