Commentaire
1- claimed benefits are not supported by evidence or quanititative arguments
2- significant harm (collateral damage to other species/nesting areas) is likely
3- in addition to noise and other disruption to 'quiet enjoyment' there are significant hazards arising from continuous presence of hunters in sensitive areas
Overall the proposal is misguided, lacks evidentiary support and shows a willingness to engage in a large scale experiment without adequate consideration of either conseqences or alternates.
At minimum, more time for review and comment is needed.
Soumis le 30 décembre 2018 11:53 AM
Commentaire sur
Proposition en vue d’établir une saison de chasse pour le cormoran à aigrettes en Ontario
Numéro du REO
013-4124
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
15906
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire