Your proposal would be in…

Your proposal would be in keeping with the historical reality of human-kind's destruction of pretty much everything in the natural world, our own self-interests first and nature a very distant second.

What are you thinking ? Certainly not about the welfare of the wildlife involved. For example, it is regretful that you pretend to worry about a few trees that ultimately fail to survive after several roostings of the cormorant. But how many trees did we use today, in the form of vanity napkins, coffee cups or throw-away ice cream sticks and the like. And these few trees ?...

And the cormorants are eating all the fish ? Sounds like the same disingenuity about the seals on the ice floes eating all the cod. So let's eliminate them, eh ? Forget that Cartier's ships were slowed by the untold thousands of them in their schools. No seals then, I guess...

Cormorants are your scapegoat, not your problem. You are chasing the dollar, and from your proposal it would appear you don’t care about anything but....