I strongly oppose this…

I strongly oppose this extremely short-sighted, omnibus legislation as it puts the health, safety and well-being of every resident in the province in jeopardy. Contrary to what the government seems to believe, regulations that protect our health, well-being & safety are not just "red tape" that is somehow makes the province less economically competitive: business cannot thrive if its workforce is sick...or dead. It cannot thrive if our infrastructure is regularly out of service as a result of environmental disaster or overwhelmed as a result of allowing development that doesn't fit provincial and municipal plans and guidelines. It cannot thrive if our ecosystem is in decline. It cannot thrive if residents have all moved away because Ontario municipalities have done away with everything that made them comfortable places to live. It cannot thrive if the water supply is dwindling and/or contaminated, if soil is toxic and can no longer grow food, and breathing the air makes people sick. It cannot thrive if babies die in childcare while their parents are at work.

The fact that this is being called a "consultation" is a joke. Meaningful consultation requires providing the public with the information necessary to provide informed input. Providing an overwhelming list of significant regulatory changes without a shred of explanation as to why the change is deemed necessary or supporting research that outlines the implications of the changes, makes providing informed input difficult, if not impossible.

That said, I feel confident that I can provide informed input on the following:

1. The Open For Business Planning By-Law represents the PC government's breaking of its election promise to protect the Greenbelt. Giving municipalities the opportunity to enact legislation without any public notice, public consultation process, or possibility of appeal that allows developers to ignore regulations including those outlined in the Clean Water Act, the Great Lakes Protection Act, the Lake Simcoe Protection Act, the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act poses a threat to our health and well-being, to our ability to produce our own food, to the viability of the agriculture industry, to safe drinking water, to good air quality, and to our ability to survive the extreme weather conditions that are becoming more prevalent. There is considerable data showing how business, growth and development do not need to come at the expense of our drinking water, our clean air, or our protected natural areas.

Allowing municipalities to rubber stamp development--without any public consultation process--that doesn't fit with the province's transportation plans, growth plans, and municipal Official Plans, and without an examination of the design and technical aspects of a proposed development to ensure it is attractive and compatible with the surrounding area and infrastructure and contributes to the economic, social and environmental vitality of the municipality, sets the province up for development that will prove costly to municipalities and to the quality of life of their residents, while setting precedents that will facilitate further development that negatively impacts municipalities and their residents. Official plans, developed in consultation with residents, ensure development contributes positively to the fabric of the municipality by ensuring adequate greenspace, appropriate public infrastructure, preservation of heritage properties, and provision of housing. It is not useless "red tape": If development has a negative impact on the fabric of a municipality, it will make the area less attractive to business and potential employees.

The Clean Water Act was put in place after the tragedy in Walkerton, Ontario where seven people died from e-coli poisoning -- and people there are still feeling its effects. The regulation requires land use planning decisions to protect drinking water safety and the health of the people of Ontario. 80% of Ontarians get our drinking water from the Great Lakes. Bill 66 threatens the health of the Great Lakes and safety of our drinking water by allowing developers to ignore the various protections currently in place that help protect the health of some of the planet's most important bodies of fresh water.

The Greenbelt protects Ontario farmland, forests, and nature. It provides habitat for wildlife and productive farmland that supports rural jobs, and a strong agricultural business sector. According to the Insurance Bureau of Canada, severe weather such as floods, wildfires, droughts and ice storms caused $4.9 billion in insurable damage in 2016. The costs in the first six months of this year alone is $350 per household. These costs would increase considerably if these spaces were lost to residential development. The Greenbelt and Ontario’s natural heritage are our strongest assets for growing food, preventing flooding, ensuring Ontarians have clean drinking water and providing habitat for wildlife – ecological services that amount to an estimated $2.6 billion per year, according to a recent study. The Oak Ridges Moraine is similarly important.

2. Restrictions on the number and ages of children home-based child care providers are permitted to care for are in place to prevent more children from being killed while in home-based childcare. If you want to make it easier for parents to find more affordable childcare, fund more childcare spaces. If MPPs have the money to spend on increasing housing subsidies for yourselves, then you must have money to keep our children safe.

3. The Toxics Reduction Act - Unless you provide evidence that these regulations are redundant, then I will assume that repealing this legislation will result in a perpetuation and possible increase in the use and production of toxics that currently pollute our air, our land, and our water and undermine the health and well-being of everyone in the province, and therefore should not be repealed.

I do not support the attacks on the well-being of the province proposed in Bill 66.