Commentaire
I strongly support a long-term Section 55 Regulatory Exemption for the forest sector which recognizes the Crown Forest Sustainability Act (CFSA) as an equivalent process to the Endangered Species Act (ESA). I do not support the attempts at harmonization of the CFSA with the ESA through amendments to Section 18 as proposed in this posting.
The forest sector is an important driver of the northern economy and therefore a solution to the ESA is critical. Many businesses and families in Ontario North and North-West rely on the forestry sector to feed, clothe and shelter their families. We are taught from an early stage of our development to protect but also respect the land and the forests. And with that comes the diversity of nature, ie. The endangered species. It is truly an incredible experience to see a Bald Eagle soaring in the skies above, something people in the north appreciate and value. I work in the Forestry sector with incredible people who value the land while at the same time ensuring that it and the endangered species are protected.
Endangered species are important, but so are jobs, communities, and the economy.
The best way to manage for all three objectives is clearly by making the balanced CFSA an equivalent process to the ESA.
Soumis le 15 mai 2019 9:16 AM
Commentaire sur
Examen décennal de la Loi de 2007 sur les espèces en voie de disparition de l’Ontario : Modifications proposées
Numéro du REO
013-5033
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28853
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire