Commentaire
I'm really concerned that changes to the Endangered Species Act will move us backwards rather than forwards. Scientists have been sounding the alarm over the loss of species in Ontario and around the world for quite some time now. Allowing developers and other proponents of harmful activities to pay into a fund in lieu of fulfilling requirements for on-the-ground compensation is an easy way out for them, which reduces accountability and makes it far easier to proceed with activities that harm species at risk and their habitats.
Another concern is the removal of the independent expert consultant who vets whether new regulations or permits would jeopardize the survival of a species. This is horrifying - how will we know if we are making a good decision if we don't consult with those that know the most about the environment we are impacting?
Multiple delays are proposed for the listing, planning and reporting on species at risk, undermining species recovery. Of deep concern is the proposal to list species nine months after COSSARO makes its assessments public – during this time vulnerable plants, animals and their habitats could be eliminated before protections kick in.
If you really care about our natural environment and its impacts on human health, you would reconsider these and other changes to the ESA. You can't put a price on nature...once it's gone, it's gone. Remember, you aren't just governing people, but also the land in this province. Be responsible and visionary, with proper stewardship of our natural environment. Leave the ESA alone!
Soumis le 17 mai 2019 11:43 PM
Commentaire sur
Examen décennal de la Loi de 2007 sur les espèces en voie de disparition de l’Ontario : Modifications proposées
Numéro du REO
013-5033
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
30655
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire