Commentaire
I am against this bill for the following reasons:
There are significantly more recreationalists such as bird watchers, hikers, dog walkers, photographers, geocachers, and families than hunters or outfitters in the province, many of whom are unfamiliar with hunting and firearm safety protocols who may be put at risk as a result of this move.
Moving bait piles closer to publicly accessible roadways or trails increases the probability of negative encounters between wildlife (of all species who are potentially attracted to the bait piles) and non-hunters or outfitters.
Moving bait piles closer to roadways increases the probability of vehicular collisions with large animals (there are tens of thousands of such incidents, including those causing serious harm to the wildlife, the driver and passengers, vehicles; additionally, this can influence insurance rates and road maintained costs). (Source: http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/motorvehiclesafety/tp-tp14798-1289.htm)
As more recreationalists who are not hunters use wild spaces, regulations should be put in place to protect them – not increase the possibility or probability that they will be harmed by hunting and hunting-related activities such as baiting.
Soumis le 18 mai 2019 12:44 PM
Commentaire sur
Proposition visant à réduire la distance minimale de mise en place des appâts par rapport aux emprises et aux sentiers pour la chasse à l’ours noir
Numéro du REO
019-0022
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
30708
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire