Dear Minister Clark, I am…

Dear Minister Clark,

I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed changes found in the proposed Provincial Policy Statement, 2023 (PPS 2023). Specifically, I am concerned about the impact the proposed policies will have on agricultural lands in the province.

Ontario’s prime agricultural land is a finite, non-renewable resource that comprises less than 5% of Ontario’s land base1. With the growing rate of farmland loss in the province, currently at a rate of 319 acres per day2, it is more important than ever before that the province protects our prime areas. Ontario’s farmland directly supports the agri-food sector, which is the largest economic sector in the province, employing more than 750,000 Ontarians along the supply chain and annually contributing over $47 billion to the province’s GDP3.

While I recognize the need to address issues of housing availability and affordability, I am concerned that several of the policies in the proposed PPS 2023 will not adequately contribute to the housing issues and instead will create significant issues for the long-term viability of Ontario’s agri-food sector. This submission will focus primarily on the proposed PPS 2023 impacts on the agricultural system.

Comments regarding Agricultural Systems and the proposed PPS 2023

While I appreciate the attempt to adapt the Growth Plan policies pertaining to agricultural system mapping into the PPS 2023, the language undermines the previous requirement for municipalities in the Greater Golden Horseshoe from requiring them to use agricultural systems. S4.3.1 states, “planning authorities are encouraged to use an agricultural system approach.” The use of the word ‘encouraged’ is not strong enough and will not require municipalities to use the provincial agricultural system mapping. Given that this is now optional for municipalities, it will decrease the likelihood of adopting agricultural systems mapping and create fragmented agricultural systems between municipalities. This is partly due to the added responsibility on rural municipalities that tend to have more limited resources to complete agricultural system mapping that the province would otherwise support. The use of a provincial agricultural systems approach to planning is crucial to protect agricultural land given its importance as an economic driver and in recognition of the natural heritage and hydrological features and functions that farmland plays4.

Recommendation 1: The province should amend the language in the proposed PPS 2023 that requires agricultural system mapping for all municipalities.

I note the removal of the policy language which stated, “planning authorities shall designate prime agricultural areas and specialty crop areas in accordance with guidelines developed by the Province.” Instead, the proposed s.4.3.1.2 states, “as part of the agricultural land base, prime agricultural areas, including specialty crop areas, shall be designated and protected for long-term use for agriculture.” There is concern as to the various approaches that municipalities may choose to take on designating prime agricultural areas. Provincial guidelines should remain the standard by which municipalities designate prime agricultural areas, in order to ensure a consistent approach across municipalities. By removing this policy, the province is risking inconsistent approaches to designating prime agricultural areas which can lead to further farmland fragmentation, particularly between municipal boundaries. It is important to note that farmland fragmentation makes farming practices significantly more challenging and creates and assortment of land-use conflicts. While the policy states that prime agricultural areas and specialty crop areas shall be designated and protected for long-term use for agriculture, s.4.3.3 permits up to three lot severances per farm parcel, which undermines the protection s.4.3.1.2 states it is intended to provide. It is important to highlight here the contradictory nature of these sections: S.4.3.3 needs to be removed in order to protect the agricultural system that the PPS 2023 proposes needs to be protected.

Recommendation 2: The PPS 2023 should include the requirement for municipalities to use the guidelines developed by the province to designate prime agricultural areas and specialty crop areas.

Recommendation 3: S.4.3.3 should be removed in its entirety as it undermines and contradicts the notion of a contiguous agricultural system.

I acknowledge that the policy provides opportunities for housing for new and young farmers during succession planning and transitioning the farm to new operators. However, municipalities should be permitted to allow for additional restrictions to help protect prime agricultural areas and mitigate the likelihood of conflict arising. The proposed s.4.3.3.2 prevents municipalities from being able to be more restrictive and prevent these types of conflicts, as well as utilize their own local knowledge and context for their communities needs, such as rural communities whose economies are heavily based on agricultural production. The weakened policies on utilizing provincial frameworks for designating prime agricultural areas as well as agricultural system mapping will put these rural and agricultural communities at risk.

Recommendation 4: S.4.3.3.2 should be removed in order to allow rural and agricultural communities the ability to properly protect their agricultural system, rural character, and implement local context into their official plans and zoning by-laws.

I urge the province to reconsider the proposed policy changes that have weakened the requirements for municipalities to implement an agricultural system and limit their ability to include more restrictive provisions to protect their rich agricultural land base and economies. This will help ensure the long-term viability of agriculture in Ontario and protect the agri-food sector’s significant contributions to the province’s GDP and employment numbers.

Sincerely, H.Clark