Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83570

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The biggest constraint in rural areas is the limit on severances by consent. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83572

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

1. The new provincial policy must refer to and promote the 'American Declaration of Indigenous Rights' which supercedes the Planning Act and is applicable to all lands in the North and South American Continents (including 'Ontario'). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83576

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly object to the proposed residential lot creation policies for prime agricultural areas provided in section 4.3.3 of the revised Provincial Policy Statement. These lot creation policies offend all good planning principles. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83589

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Policies that expand urban boundaries without regard for the environment are unsustainable and will drive the cost of housing up. In addition, it will place undue burden on communities that already exist in built up areas.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83592

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed changes for extra housing in farm country will lead to urban sprawl. Urban sprawl will in turn lead to more conflict between farm and none-farm occupations and also increase pollution by more car traffic, etc. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83593

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do NOT remove density targets! All this does is encourages speculator, land developer sprawl. This is bad environmental policy, this is bad housing policy. This does not create communities. It creates sprawl. We need LESS suburban sprawl. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83595

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Stop building homes on farmland. You'll bankrupt cities.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83596

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

People should be able to live near their work. Building homes in rural areas does nothing to enable that wish by Ontarians.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83597

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Minimum density standards must be maintained and enhanced for any city in the golden horshoe area. Removing those requirements enriches developers and bankrupts everyone else: tax payers, cities, home buyers.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83599

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Any plan for housing needs to make it possible to walk or bike to a transit station. If I have to drive my car to park it at the transit hub that's a policy and zoning failure. Let me live where I can walk to places of interest.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83600

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This plan sacrifices our climate and the long term financial health of cities for short-term windfall profits for developers. It's shameful.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83601

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Any intelligent, thinking person who has been paying attention to climate and housing issues over the last several years realizes what a backwards proposal this is. Additional housing should be built in areas where infrastructure already exists. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83603

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The term 'employment' in the policy document should be replaced with industrial. It is clear from the definition in the document that employment means industrial. The term 'employment' is vague and ambiguous. It is not well understood by municipal staff and managers or the public. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83613

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I was shocked that after 23 years of not supporting new lot creation that PPS is actually suggesting the allowance of up to three severances, subject to certain criteria, along with the possible severance of accessory residential units from agricultural parcels. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83617

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If there are so many requirements that the new proposal would confer onto municipalities to achieve these goals, and yet the bill-23 seeks to reduces development charge funding and other development funding necessary to pay for the infrastructure like roads, trails, community centres, fire stations, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83619

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

All of Ontario is NOT a place to build large houses that no one but the richest in society can afford. The proposed changes (i.e. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83620

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed policy has key flaws. 1. Minimum density targets for new development on unbuilt land are too low. More urban sprawl will result. 2. Development in Ontario's Greenbelt needs to be considered more carefully with a mind to environmental conservation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83621

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is entirely irresponsible to reduce previous set density targets in an effort to address our housing shortage. It is proven urban sprawl is not economically viable for municipal services in the long run. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83622

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The new policy proposals are moving Ontario inthe exact opposite direction from where we need to go. Your new policy encourages lower density and suburban sprawl at a time when we need to preserve green spaces and increase public transit usage to limit and mitigate the impacts of climate change. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83627

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Our timid thinking, focusing on "mid-rise" and "small aparrtment buildings," needs to be replaced with bolder, yet simple ideas, if we hope to reach "the province's housing target of 285,000 new homes." Here are two simple ideas for Toronto planners to consider. Lire davantage