Commentaire
Moving target shouldn't be an excuse for the bad work of Ashgrove. How we measures emissions change its like when I don't a car emissions test. What would have passed before the car fails now. . .
I wonder how the area will be impacted and it sounds like it' would be normal to the area but certainly not in the direction of improving 🤔 they're working around the system (if accepted)
If they want to operate in vacuum, they say there could be a lawsuit but it doenst sound like accountability to causing damage to others. I wonder if there's measurable ways that a 3rd party to check in shorter duration than 7 years . And then option to pivot. It can't be too little too late. Because 7 is very easy to round up and say we been doing thsi for 10 years already. They should have some sort of whistle blower policy that is neutral keeping tabs on the work
Liens connexes
Soumis le 10 janvier 2024 9:25 AM
Commentaire sur
CRH Canada Group Inc. - Environmental Compliance Approval (air)
Numéro du REO
019-8010
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
95718
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire