Commentaire
The proposed Provincial Planning Statement 2024 represents a positive step forward to introduce flexibility into a previously excessively rigid planning system. The Growth Plan introduced in 2006 had put in place policies that reduced growth, and deliberately suppressed the availability of land for housing through either conversions, or settlement area expansions. This set of anti-growth policies is the principal cause of the current housing crisis in Ontario. The new proposed Provincial Planning Statement will remove many of these barriers, and as a result will ultimately produce the delivery of additional housing supply.
The new focused definition of "employment area" helps to clarify and focus such land use designations as originally intended - on protecting land for space extensive manufacturing and warehousing.
The new proposed "employment area" definition should, however, be modified slightly to prevent the "grandfathering" provisions being used as a loophole through which a municipality can continue an employment area designation on lands that are entirely, or mostly, composed of non-employment uses. Such abuse in the past has made the introduction of housing into what are essentially mixed-use areas difficult, by making conversions necessary to introduce housing into areas otherwise entirely appropriate for housing.
Other positive changes include the ability to apply for conversions outside the context of a municipal comprehensive review, and the inclusion of more appropriate policy tests for conversions. Taken together, these policy changes, if properly able to be enforced through appeals to the Tribunal if necessary (a companion change still missing from Bill 185), should result in significant additional housing supply being constructed in the future in Ontario.
Supporting documents
Soumis le 10 mai 2024 12:25 PM
Commentaire sur
Révision des politiques proposées pour un nouvel instrument de politique de planification provinciale.
Numéro du REO
019-8462
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
99062
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire