Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19911

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am deeply concerned that waterways, farmlands, and natural lands are threatened by development and environmental deregulation. This is not a constructive, healthy direction for our province. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19948

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a bad bill. It is bad for workers, it is terrible for the environment, and it is being pushed through without adequate transparency. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19958

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to you to ask that you keep your promise to protect the Greenbelt and therefore call back legislature and introduce a new Bill 66 that stops the attacks on the Greenbelt, Oak Ridges Moraine, Lake Simcoe, Source Water Protection Areas and other important protected farm and natural areas Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19967

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing because I am opposed to “Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018” along with the proposed regulations associated with the “Open-for-business planning tool” My expertise is in archaeology and cultural heritage management and these proposals could negatively, and dramatical Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19990

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We are responsible for leaving a healthy environment for future generations. As the governing party of this province I ask that you be part of that. Urban sprawl is not the answer. Protect and improve what we already have and don't destroy more.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19992

Commentaire fait au nom

Conservation Ontario

Statut du commentaire

Please see the attached document which outlines Conservation Ontario's comments on the proposed Bill 66, Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act (EBR#013-4293), the Proposed Open-for-business Planning Tool (EBR#013-4125), and the proposed New Regulation under the Planning Act for open-for-business p Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20012

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my dismay about the recklessness of Bill 66. The regulations that it is proposing to repeal are essential to protecting the health and well being of the citizens of Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20030

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I object to the off-loading of what should be a provincial responsibility for stewardship of our environment to the municipalities. A foreseeable result is a chaotic and uneven patchwork of permitted land use and development throughout Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20041

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Agriculture is a primary business in Ontario so anything that jeopardizes farmland should not be considered in the "open for business" strategy. Further urban sprawl will endanger prime farmland, water and other resources so also should not be allowed in any "open for business" strategy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20051

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Association of professional Archaeologists

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the Ontario Association of Professional Archaeologists (APA) we wish to express our deep concerns regarding Bill 66 and in particular the open-for-business by-law contained within the bill which would allow municipalities to opt-out of a range of provisions included in the planning act Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20102

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66, Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act, 2018 is aimed at increasing employment by cutting red tape - eliminating redundant regulations. This bill contains two Schedules, 5 and 10, that will needlessly bypass or eliminate critical regulations and put public health and safety at risk. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20127

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm incredibly concerned about the provincial government's plan to sidestep very important provisions of a number of environmental protection acts with this act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20138

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 schedule 10 should be withdrawn and abandoned. The effects of this bill put at risk our farmland ,natural heritage systems, our democracy, our wildlife, our wells and water sources. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20143

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 schedule 10 should be withdrawn and abandoned. The effects of this bill put at risk our farmland ,natural heritage systems, our democracy, our wildlife, our wells and water sources. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20161

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my strong opposition to Schedule 10 of Bill 66, which introduces “open-for-business by-laws” that would circumvent many of the requirements under several laws to ensure fair, consistent and transparent public engagement in land use decisions and protection of water, natural h Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20171

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am not in favour of the proposed OFP-ZBL planning tool as proposed. In its current form it: - Disregards important provincial policy documents like the PPS and the Big Move side-stepping planning principles followed to create liveable communities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20180

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose the proposed Open for business planning tool because of the negative impacts that it will have on my community and on our environment, our water, our air and our health. Lire davantage