Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21850

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have been concerned with the Endangered Species Act since it's inception in that each of the members of Cossarro have their own pet animal to put on the list. Most of the time without any scientific basis. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21852

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Something needs to be done so that people who live on a developed property can build an addition or tear down the old house and build a new one. I have to wait a year and have a very expensive EIS report completed. This is absolutely ridiculous.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21854

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I disagree with the basic premises behind the consultation that the Endangered Species Act imposes restrictions that are too onerous on business. When the legislation was introduced a decade ago there had been extensive consultation to avoid such problems. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21856

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

43. Birds Bank Swallow Riparia riparia 44. Birds Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica Birds Grasshopper Sparrow Ammodramus savannarum These birds should be removed from the list. They are causing way too much damage in factories, buildings and all other areas Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21857

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I believe the ESA should: a. Maintain its science-based listing process and not allow possibility of minister discretion at listing. This is one of main issues of fed. Species At Risk Act (SARA) Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21859

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I believe the ESA should: a. Maintain its science-based listing process and not allow possibility of minister discretion at listing. This is one of main issues of federal Species At Risk Act (SARA) Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21860

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the ESA review discussion paper. Though I support the stated intent to provide more stringent protections for species at risk, the proposals being considered will not accomplish that goal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21861

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

To repeal any parts of the Endangered Species Act in the sole interest of expanding businesses is careless, and does not take into consideration many parts of what future generations need in order to survive. Businesses will not give us clean water. Businesses will not solve our air pollution. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21865

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a stakeholder my main concern is the make up of members of COSSARO and their track record of adding to the SAR list based solely on their personal ideologies. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21866

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Chamber of Commerce

Statut du commentaire

February 15, 2019 The Honourable Rod Phillips Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks 77 Wellesley Street West 11th Floor, Ferguson Block Toronto, ON M7A 2T5 RE: Review of Ontario’s Endangered Species Act Dear Minister Phillips, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21868

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Endangered Species Act is an important part of Ontario's role in conserving biodiversity. I believe that the only way to have a legitimate ESA is for the process to be scientifically based. The listing should be based on science, and the habitat protection needs to be mandatory. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21869

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I believe the ESA should: -Maintain its science-based listing process and not allow possibility of minister discretion at listing. - Maintain mandatory habitat protection Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21870

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In the past species have been added to the list based not on science but for political reasons that appeal to select groups. This is particularly evident with the designation of the "Algonquin wolf". Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21871

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do not allow minister discretion. Maintain habitat protection. Allow specific funding for protecting species. Use evidence based, scientific information that acknowledges climate change to make informed decisions to help protect our biodiversity.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21883

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

10-year review of Ontario ESA - comments in response to Discussion Paper The comments respond to the four areas of focus in the Discussion Paper. 1. Landscape approaches to recovery planning Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21886

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not change the Endangered Species Act so that it is less effective than it is now at protecting endangered species. White the Act can be time-consuming to comply with at times it is the best chance we have of changing people's behaviour so that endangered species are protected. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21887

Commentaire fait au nom

Precision Biomonitoring Inc.

Statut du commentaire

Environmental DNA or eDNA is a modern method for confirming the presence or absence of an aquatic or semi-aquatic species. It is based on the detection of eDNA left behind by an organsims. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21900

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for the opportunity to add our voices to the public consultation on the discussion paper as part of the review of the Endangered Species Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

21901

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose any changes that would in any way weaken protections for animals or their habitats. Protection for animals and their habitats is essential and loosening restrictions is not something any government should be considering.