Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20342

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against Proposed Bill 66: Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act threatens our environment, our water, our air, our health.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20360

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Je suis opposée à l'abrogation de la Loi de 2009 sur la réduction des toxiques le 31 décembre 2021. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20377

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I object to this omnibus legislation that will adversely affect so many aspects of the quality of life of for the people of Ontario by removing or reducing protection of our water sources, air quality, wetlands, and greenbelt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20397

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If the implementation of plans is voluntarily what are the incentives of industry to even have any plans?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20405

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose Bill 66 especially the proposed changes to Schedule 5 and 10 for the following reasons. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20422

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This site states that 'this proposal will cost current facilities an annual average administrative cost of $818,000 to learn about the changes to the regulations and to continue reporting on existing toxics substances until 2021.' Clearly a portion of this cost is staff time to learn the new require Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20464

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Comments re: EBR Registry # 013-4235 (Planning and Reporting Changes Under the Toxics Reduction Program and Ontario Regulation 455/09) Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20465

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario's natural environment, wildlife, and drinking water needs to continue to be protected. It cannot be compromised. There needs to be greater protection for Canada's land, not less. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20479

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a long time resident of Hamilton/Stoney Creek, I am deeply concerned about the proposed changes outlined in Bill 66. I have lived and worked in this area for many years and have grown to love the social and natural diversity here. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20540

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'd like to share my disagreement with the proposed Bill 66 and this repeal. I feel the negative impacts it will have on our environment, water security, air, and health are far greater than the proposed competitiveness gain. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20548

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not support this proposed Bill as it will make it easier for companies to not address the impact of toxins on our environment.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20656

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am really concerned about the proposed changes to the Toxics Reduction Act which would exempt facilities FOREVER from having to make a toxics reduction plan, or report on such a plan, including "Facilities that have never planned or reported under the program, but now meet the reporting threshold Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20690

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is absolutely essential that Ontario reduce its toxins levels if it is truly going to be "open for business" and competitive globally. That is the future of business and healthy economies. To not be required to review or report on toxin reduction plans is to give businesses free reign. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20722

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I say no to these changes. Accountability is a must!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20735

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my strong opposition to Schedule 5 of Bill 66. For myself as well as for my 4 children (and their children's children...) The position of this government that repealing the TRA eliminates unnecessary duplication of laws is FALSE   Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20754

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a University of Toronto student and a future engineer, I oppose the proposed changes. They amount to an abdication by the provincial government of its responsibility to regulate harmful substances in the absence of a complete Chemicals Management Plan federally. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20768

Commentaire fait au nom

The Ontario Soil Regulation Task Force

Statut du commentaire

Submissions on Bill 66 – Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018, Schedule 5: “Repeal of the Toxics Reduction Act, 2009 and all associated regulations by December 31, 2021” (ERO # 013-4234) and “Planning and reporting changes under the toxics reduction program and Ontario Regulation 455/09” ( Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20779

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Putting the health and safety of Ontarians at the hands of developers is very, very dangerous and completely wrong. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20805

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Dear Mr. Friesen, I do not support Bill 66 and more specifically do not support the following changes as outlined in section 5: No longer require facilities with existing toxics reduction plans to conduct reviews of those plans; Lire davantage