Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

55455

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The wood pellet industry is a dirty big secret. The smoke by product contributes to pollution and in fact contributes to our climate disaster.We need trees to sequester carbon Stop cutting down our boreal forests

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

55457

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

When is the Ontario government going to stop trying to bamboozle the public with dishonest claims that they are concerned about protecting the environment while constantly condoning and encouraging extraction and construction companies to further destroy our forests, our agricultural lands, our wetl Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

55459

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

- One of the main products of Ontario’s forest biomass industry is wood pellets. Wood pellets are marketed as a clean energy alternative, but we know that wood pellets are dirtier than coal at the smokestack. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

55461

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We oppose the governments plan to expand the production of wood pellets. Burning wood pellets produces as much greenhouse gases as does burning wood. Why would the government encourage such a detrimental industry. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

55464

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As you are well aware, wood pellets are dirtier than coal at the smokestack. Therefore, promoting the production of wood pellets is in sharp contrast to your rhetoric that professes support for action against climate change. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

55466

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like to register my objections to the expansion of the wood pellet industry, which is clearly the aim of the Forest Biomass Action Plan. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

55467

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This wasn’t a good idea at it’s inception. At worst, using only the brush and “waste” of regular lumber industry leavings should be required for burning and toilet paper. Other than that, reforested areas can be recycled every forty years or so.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

55469

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We cannot afford false climate solutions that are marching us into planetary catastrophe while trampling Indigenous Sovereignty and crucial biodiversity. Burning wood pellets is not a viable green energy solution. It isn't even a green solution. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

55472

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It’s time to explore and use geothermal energy. Where Earth’s crust is thinnest, drill to major heat source and pump a heat retaining liquid through it to produced electricity (sodium?). It really isn’t all that complicated.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

55474

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I live near what is left of Ontario's old-growth boreal forest. I've viewed the destructive forestry industry's clear-cuts, lack of tree replanting, the vast garbage dumped and left by cutters for close to 70 years. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

55475

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

One of the main products of Ontario’s forest biomass industry is wood pellets. Wood pellets are marketed as a clean energy alternative, but we know that wood pellets are dirtier than coal at the smokestack. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

55480

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The argument to expand the forest-biomass industry, particularly the wood pellet sector, to provide low-carbon jobs in replacement of fossil fuel jobs IS NOT valid. Lire davantage