Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78693

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There is no question that Ontario needs more housing; however, it should not be at the expense of the environment. There is absolutely no need to build houses in the Greenbelt, especially since Premier Ford earlier stated publicly that no land in the Greenbelt would be open to development! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78696

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I've been reading various news articles, visiting web-sites and watching news reports for weeks now regarding your Greenbelt ideas and the whole think looks as shady as hell. Can't put any more plainly than that. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78697

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the Labourers International Union of North America (LiUNA) we support the bold action plan by the provincial government to respond to our growing housing crisis, building a proposed 1.5 million homes over the next 10 years. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78702

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Doig Ford made a campaign promise not to touch the Greenbelt. So much for honesty and integrity. This government needs to be investigated for criminal collusion with developers. We must protect the Greenbelt from the greed of short sighed Profiteers.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78704

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against changing the greenbelt or swapping lands out for building housing. It is totally possible to build housing within existing boundaries. Just be more assertive with provincial land use powers and upzone the entire province aggressively.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78705

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The only word I can think of to describe this proposal is disgusting. It is a proposal that benefits a very few developers at the expense of the people of Ontario, the environment, and our food security. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78706

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Use the land available: according to municipal leaders there is no need for this. Listen to the experts …. Start moving things north……especially government jobs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78711

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Despite repeated promises that there would be no removal of lands from the Greenbelt, the Government of Ontario is proposing to do just that: carve 7,400 acres out of the Greenbelt for development (ERO #019-6216 and #019-6217). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78712

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My comments below pertain to Bill 23, the proposal to remove greenbelt land. The passing of this Bill will have a disastrous impact on the future health, economic, and general well being of citizens of Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78715

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The kind of development being supported by these amendments results in much higher infrastructure maintenance costs to the municipalities compared to urban development. It does not make housing more affordable. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78716

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposed plan is lunacy. The only people who will benefit are the developers and those in their pockets, not people in desperate need of housing, as these locations will be too far away and too expensive for those who need it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78718

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I will begin by saying that I don't believe the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is ACTUALLY seeking feedback on proposed changes to the Greenbelt Plan - I think they want to APPEAR AS THOUGH they are seeking feedback. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78726

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, I am strongly opposed to this bill and the proposed development in the green belt. This is a key voting issue for me. Please show you are listening to the people and cancel this plan. Thank you

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78727

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose plans to remove lands from the Greenbelt. It is not necessary, as there are already 88,000 acres of land on backlog for development. Major urban centres are asking for higher density housing development, why is this being circumvented to destroy the greenbelt? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

78728

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt must not be converted into developed land. By converting this land into more housing we are harming our future instead of helping it. The majority of the areas marked for removal from the greenbelt are near water which is essential for maintaining a well balanced biodiversity. Lire davantage