Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68662

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am strongly against this proposed amendment. The Greenbelt has been designated as protected land to preserve the natural heritage of Ontario and permanently protect several important wildlife and wetland areas. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68663

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hi there, I'm concerned that these proposed changes are overlooking other options to address the housing crisis Ontario is facing. Before looking to protected lands, we should be looking at currently vacant buildings and if they can be converted. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68671

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a shortsighted move. Doug Ford has broken another promise yet again in order to line the pockets of the elite. Our green space is precious, we can never undo the damage this egregious decision will cost our province, our people, our environment, etc. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68675

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This goes against treaty terms and responsibilities, this land belongs to the descendants of Indigenous communities who should dictate what that land is used for. Consult with Indigenous leaders and surrounding communities first and provide access to this process for all.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68688

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Let preface this with a notion that I'm completely and utterly against this proposal. Now that we have that out of the way, let's recall reasons why Greenbelt was created in the first place in 2005. It was created to: 1. Prevent further loss of farmland and natural heritage Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68710

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Ontario government recently announced that it intends to break its loudest, clearest election promise, by inflicting a fatal 7,400 acre wound on the vital and wildly popular Greenbelt. I OPPOSE BILL 23 AND ASK THAT THIS BILL BE STOPPED IMMEDIATELY Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68723

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a HORRIBLE idea! The key to building more homes is not by creating chaos and building on the environment we are trying to preserve. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68741

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Covid pandemic demonstrated very clearly that people need green space!! It is not okay to reduce the greenbelt! Climate change demonstrates that we need to protect our green space and trees! It is not okay to reduce the greenbelt! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68745

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please don't do this. I want Ontario to remain beautiful, with a bountiful amount of preserved nature. The Greenbelt is Southern Ontario's lungs. Reducing it only hurts future generations. Urban sprawl is a huge issue. Don't support it by chipping away at preserved green space.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68751

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Greenbelt should remain protected. It's important to the wild life of the area, and the maintaining the health of the land of the region. There are other ways to improve housing without impacting protected lands.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68812

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I urge the Premier to: withdraw the plan to remove lands from the Greenbelt; get on with a meaningful Greenbelt expansion that reflects public input - repeatedly promised but never delivered by the Ford government; Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68821

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

No. This is a bad idea. This idea benefits builders, and sacrifices natural spaces that can never be recovered. AND, it is financially a very bad idea for the municipalities that get stuck with the bill to maintain infrastructure. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68825

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The green belt was created to ensure that our city stays a healthy happy place to live. We need trees and nature to exist for people to exist. I really don’t even know what this is up for proposal. Canada is a huge country, with lots of area outside the gta greenbelt to build homes…

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68898

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We must protect the Greenbelt. There are other places to use to build homes, such as buildings and unused office space. Let’s utilize the space we already have.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68912

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I urge the Premier to: 1. withdraw the plan to remove lands from the Greenbelt; 2. get on with a meaningful Greenbelt expansion that reflects public input - repeatedly promised but never delivered by the Ford government; Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

68926

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

"Developing" the greenbelt is a terrible idea for future generations and climate as a whole. Ontario needs the green space and it was protected for a reason. It should remain protected. Lire davantage