Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72759

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We have already settled the issue of Greenbelt preservation. I am astonished that we need to debate this again. The Greenbelt must be preserved for all the reasons that it was created in the first place.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72782

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is appalling that at a time where there is a world food crisis and international goverments are clamoring for more environmental protections, that there is a proposal to raze greenbelt watershed areas and pave over prime farmland in Southern Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72846

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The reallocation and removal of certain regions of the Greenbelt will go down as one of the most eggregious acts of tragic betrayal of the Ontarian people. Mr. Ford; who once claimed and promised that he would not go near the Greenbelt has gone back on his word in an absolute shameless manner. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72881

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for considering my comment. I had a chance to read through the Report of the Ontario Housing Affordability Task Force and it iterates that: "a shortage of land isn’t the cause of the problem. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72893

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am from Toronto and I read with deep concern what the Premier is going to do to allow protected land to be used for building projects. I oppose 100% to this initiative. We have to care for our environment for our sons and daughters and our grand children. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

72993

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, i am strongly against using the Greenbelt area for housing. Greenbelt needs to be preserved to ensure healthy environment and therefore healthy people. Thank you.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73005

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not develop the Greenbelt. We need to maintain natural areas and farm land. Paving farm land does not feed people. What is the point of having a house if you do not have food? We need to keep as much of our environment undeveloped as possible for the sake of the future of humanity. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73254

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose any infringement on the greenbelt. Housing should be created in urban areas not sprawling onto our green and growing spaces. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73256

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

First, I beleive we do not need to open up the greenbelt to development. There are lots of lands and densification that we should and must pursue. The Greenbelt was put aside for all generations, and should be developed on a whim. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73294

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Dear Madam/Sir, I have owned 785 Townline Road North, Clarington, for 40 years (since 1982). I would like my property to be made available for housing development like my neighbours property already has been. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73330

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Based on a metrolinx project I was involved in about 5 years ago, the province had enough land to build houses for the next 50 years without touching the greenbelt. What's changed? The government in power. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73335

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

City Hamilton staff have prepared comments on both ERO Posting 019-6216 and 0190-6217. Comments were uploaded to the ERO Posting 019-6216 page today and apply to both postings. Thank you.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73385

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose the proposed amendments to the greenbelt area boundary regulation! We as Ontarians need to prioritize care of our greenspace, we do not need to further diminish it in the name of development! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73411

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Withdraw Bill 23. Preserve the Greenbelt as is. Or, add to it without removing from it. Bill 23 is not progress. It is regress. It is focused on today, and not tomorrow. It is not a plan. It is a pander. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73438

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Paving over prime farmland on the Greenbelt is neither necessary nor wise and your government is deceiving people saying it is. This is simply to enrich your already wealthy developer backers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73577

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There are other ways to density this city than to jeopardize our future and the one of our children. The green belt and wetlands are currently protected for a reason, and from an environmental standpoint it makes absolutely no sense to get rid of them. Lire davantage