Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74902

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hands off the Greenbelt!! Keep your promise Ford! This is not the solution to solving the housing crisis. Sprawl will only be costly and make the climate crisis worse. The Greenbelt is critically important for us all.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74908

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It’s harder and more expensive to build in a wetland area. Why would anyone do that when there is serviced urban space just waiting for revival/ redevelopment. It makes no sense.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74910

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is a grave mistake to change the boundaries of the Greenbelt Act or Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan. We have more than enough land to create the housing we need in the Greater Toronto Area. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74932

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hands off the Greenbelt… no exceptions! NYC needs housing but they haven’t put condos on Central Park! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74933

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Sad to see the Greenbelt being slowly chipped away at. This was one of Doug Ford's election promises that he would not touch it. Not very democratic and the fact that developers are waiting with land already bought is suspicious. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74943

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly disagree with the proposed changes to the Greenbelt. The area was designated after widespread environment consultation and consideration. It represents important greenspace and watersheds and it is not appropriate to change this. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74953

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

1. Your proposal to open small pieces of the Greenbelt fragments the habitat, which is environmentally unsound practice. 2. It will have no impact on the creation of housing in cities where most people live. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74954

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This ammendement and Bill 23 are kneejerk reactions to the proposed 1.5 million new immigrants coupled with a severe lack of homes for already established Canadians. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74972

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We need to protect and grow the green belt. And we don’t need more cul-de-sacs and highways, we need affordable, environmentally sound housing supported by mass transit. There seems to be a total denial of climate change within this government.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74974

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Bill must not pass. It favours the wrong kind of development. I see land all around me that could be put to better use. Homeowners on suburban plots can be part of densification that communities need economically while supporting construction, good jobs and building healthy local economies. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74979

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Will the changes to the Greenbelt area really provide affordable housing? How many units will be affordable housing and will it only be the developers profiting from not paying development charges. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75020

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, I want to know protections and safeguards will be in place to ensure that the housing being built will actually be accessible and affordable for those who have been left out of home ownership. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75032

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The More Hones, Built Faster Act intends to expand land resources for housing development into the long protected “Greenbelt” surrounding the GTA. This need for more land is not borne out by reality. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75101

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would not like to see any protected area be redesignated. These areas are protected for a reason. This is a very slippery slope and undermines the integrity of government promises. Who will protect these green spaces for our future generations.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75131

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The provincial Government needs to encourage the construction of more affordable homes and rental units in the province; however It is vital for our future that it does so in an environmentally sustainable way not only in terms of construction methods but very importantly in terms of where Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75133

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly disagree with the proposed amendments to the Greenbelt Area boundary regulation. The Greenbelt is intended to be permanently protected land. If we start chipping away at it, it will open the door for future reductions to this important space. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75136

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt was created to serve the purpose of preserving wildlife and limiting human impact on nature. Its boundries need to be preserved and bill 23 reversed. Save the greenbelt!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75139

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There are obviously monetary reasons for developers to target beautiful natural spaces to build one family dwellings with lawns and driveways and roads, services, and the usual use of chemicals involved in suburban housing. Planting invasive species destroy habitats near developments. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75155

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I feel that it is vitally important to protect Ontario's greenbelt as it currently exists for the well-being and enjoyment of this and future generations. Greenbelt lands should not be used for housing or other developments. Lire davantage