Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83633

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Agree with * Housing density around major transit lines - add increased minimum percentage * homes on farmland for workers - add net-zero builds * mandatory mixed housing - add % specifics so that higher density housing has greater proportion Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83637

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The following proposals will facilitate unnecessary urban sprawl, further fragment agricultural areas making it more difficult for farmers to operate, and put further pressure on natural areas at a time when we need to be protecting them for carbon sequestration and water resource management purpose Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83690

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

What are the provincial enforcement mechanisms to ensure municipalities implement these policies in order to increase the approved land available for housing stock? If there is no enforcement, these provincial goals will not be achieved.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83694

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is a good step forward, curious to see how it affects the eastern Ontario municipalities that tend to see extreme pushback from residents and council members who undermine the housing projects, they make it difficult to develop housing in city centres and adjacent to major transit nodes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83700

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Appreciate the latest round of changes, what is the province doing to get commenting agencies to also ensure that their comments are supportive of new housing and not just a redundant comment that adds further delays?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83702

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am concerned with the lack of natural heritage portions in the new proposed PPS. Will there be an official release of the natural heritage section? When will this be? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83703

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I appreciate the consideration of updating the Provincial Policy Statement. As the owner of one of the largest development consulting firms (Planning, Architecture and Engineering) in Ontario, we have seen a number of unnecessary development hurdles over the years. A few suggestions: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83714

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Some comments based on the proposed changes to the Plamning Act PPS and GPGGH. "Require municipalities to permit more housing on farms, including residential lot creation subject to criteria, additional residential units and housing for farm workers" Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83719

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Morning, Thank you for opening this portal again to allow for questions and comments. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83723

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Aanii/Bonjour: The expansion of a municipal boundary, without the official Consent of any First Nation impacted by such an expansion, is a violation of the Crown's Duty to Consult and is a breach of the Honour of the Crown. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83774

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I think the Province should strongly reconsider opening the door to non-farm lot creation in prime agricultural areas. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83785

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Firstly, for the sake of all Ontario residents and its future residents, do NOT allow development on the Greenbelt. This is one of the most precious resources we have in all of Canada, which needs to be protected. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83788

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a farmer, I applaud the proposal to allow additional houses to be built on the farm to support multigenerational families. Housing prices are incredibly high and availability is not abundant. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83791

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal encourages 1950"s sprawl - it is encourages cutting in to our green spaces further impacting the environment, waterways and endangered species. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83814

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a young male living in Waterloo Region, specifically Elmira, Im happy to see the provincial government is actually doing something to help remedy the obvious housing crisis thats occurring in our region. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83907

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Supportive of the Rural Growth proposed changes. I would suggest a maximum lot creation in the agricultural areas to minimize impacts on farm land. 1 acre lot or the equivalent metric size is sufficient even on Private services. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83911

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Why is natural heritage still under consideration, nearly 6 months after this process was initiated? Will the review and comment period be extended when the natural heritage section is applied? If not, why?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83915

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Absolutely unsupportive of this mess. The Growth Plan is a key land use planning document that has specified density targets that requires intensification, a key tool to impact climate change, improve community scale development and limit urban sprawl. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83941

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Consersative growth plan is not what most citizens want to see. Unfortunately this plan was created without the expectations of citizens taken into account.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

83943

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am glad to see the Indigenous inclusion in consideration of land use. Also glad to see the focus on single family housing changed to include diverse and mixed housing. Lire davantage