Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91229

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Greater Sudbury

Statut du commentaire

May 30, 2023 Minister Steve Clark Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing 17th Floor - 777 Bay Street Toronto, ON M7A 2J3 Delivered via email: PlanninqConsultation@ontario.ca Dear Minister Clark, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91230

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Pickering

Statut du commentaire

Please find the City of Pickering Council resolution and comments attached. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91231

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my strong opposition to proposed changes to the Provincial Policy Statement, 2022 (PPS) and the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan). These changes would accelerate urban sprawl and the ongoing loss of farmland and natural areas in Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91232

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am a small farmer and the ability to sever a lot would help our family and also create additional places for my off farm siblings to get something that was theirs. These associations speak for large farmers that squeeze the little guy to sell their whole farm not just a lot. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91233

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There is simply no need for proposed policy changes which would: - Eliminate mandatory intensification and greenfield density targets that were designed to rein in urban sprawl; Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91234

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Allowing for 1 lot to be severed would be a great compromise from the 3 first suggested. Or allow for original homesteads to be severed off the main farm and allow ARUs on the retained farm parcel that way not needing to use up any more farm land but creating more housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91235

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Changes to heritage protection regulations proposed by the government are a complete scandal. We should be increasing heritage protection, not reducing it. Look at the UK and Europe, with far stronger heritage protection laws. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91236

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We own a farm and would like to sever land for our parents to live on with the current house and build a house for our family and children. We are trying to be able to take care of our parents as they age and avoid nursing homes. We all want to be able to live and work on the farm. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91237

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

RE: ERO 019-6813 Review of proposed policies adapted from A Place to Grow and Provincial Policy Statement to form a new provincial planning policy instrument Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91238

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Cambridge

Statut du commentaire

The Review of proposed policies adapted from A Place to Grow and Provincial Policy Statement through ERO 019-6813 suggests that municipalities will be required to plan for infrastructure needed to support development, such as stormwater management, water and wastewater infrastructure. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91240

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I realize That the only people your Government pampers to are the Developers. This is a VERY SAD statement , considering Ford tried to pass himself off "as for the little guy". It shows how untrustworthy he is after he promised not to develop. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91243

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have been a rural resident in Elgin County all of my life and a farmer/landowner since 1993. I am now at retirement age and have aquired a wealth of knowledge that I have shared with all of my grown children. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91247

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Few more comments in support of land severance of non-prime-agricultural land within agricultural areas for residential use Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91248

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Here are also a few comments on the benefits of lot creation on non-agricultural land within agricultural areas for residential use as it relates to farm and estate planning with regards to severing off a lot or the current main dwelling. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91249

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is being marketed as the solution to the housing problem. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91250

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Further regarding estate planning and succession, becomes even more significant when considering non-farming children in the context of retiring on the farm. Here are some additional considerations to keep in mind: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91251

Commentaire fait au nom

County of Elgin

Statut du commentaire

With respect to the changes to the growth management policies the County has concerns that the removal of the comprehensive review process will lead to ad hoc and inconsistent approaches as to how urban expansions are approached across the Province. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91252

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

All greenbelt areas should be off limits. If there is a shortage of housing and we are desperate to use protected land, shouldn't the immigration policy be revisited so issues can be dealt with slowly and not with such aggressive building. Affordability, shortages are all different issues.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91254

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I’m concerned that the proposed legislation will make it more difficult for communities to preserve their heritage buildings by eliminating or weakening existing protections like municipal heritage registries. Lire davantage