Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84037

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hoping the province will consider/ find a way to eliminate single family only zones in the province of Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84039

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There is NO need to expand development onto Greenbelt lands. Get your heads out of your posterior and see , and read what is going on in the world !! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84060

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

many residential communities in Durham have large properties. We want to subdivide our land so others can also enjoy living in a rural community. Current Durham policy states that parcels of 100 acres can only be subdivided. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84063

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Proposed Provincial Planning Statement wording change: 4.3.3 Lot Creation and Lot Adjustments 1. Residential lot creation in prime agricultural areas is only permitted in accordance with provincial guidance for: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84067

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I live in Woodslee in Southwestern Ontario. I am writing this comment with the hope that the province can give municipalities more flexibilty when it comes to in fill lots in the rural area. In my situation we have a double lot 300 feet by 300 feet. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84074

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We all understand the housing shortage and the need to get more built as quickly as possible With subdivisions being built to make our city's and towns larger In doing so Rural property owners can not get severances of their property even if the property Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84078

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario's latest housing plan encourages sprawl, which will be disastrous for our communities and province. This plan will take away irreplaceable natural habitats for flora/fauna and important flood absorption sites. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84084

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

These proposed changes are unnecessary. This is a land grab intended to promote unsustainable development in order to benefit the Premier's developer friends. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84086

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is beyond belief that the provincial government would blow up the Growth Plan for the GGH. Your job is to manage the province in a way that protects the health and welfare of the people. Controlling growth and protecting the agricultural system and the natural heritage system are fundamental. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84088

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please terminate any consideration around amendments to our greenbelt. It was created for this exact reason and should not be for sale.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84090

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed changes to the PPS undermine the public's interest in preserving resources for future populations, specifically: our limited prime agricultural land; heritage areas; employment areas; and environmental sustainability. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84091

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Would be nice to have some incentives available, such as government grants, to implement Laneway Houses (additional dwelling units within the lot). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84098

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We need more housing in rural areas. Uxbridge and the surrounding areas have alot of housing poverty. Alot of wealthy people are moving to rural communities. We need to open up rural residential areas to be able to subdivide. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84099

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It would be great if rural properties could be able to divide into 1 acre lots to provide additional housing for the community.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84100

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not approve this, food prices, ecosystems, flood, the constituents that you are supposed to protect are being violated on behalf of private interests, we will be the ones paying higher property taxes, higher food prices and taking the risk of floods. I do not support this Bill.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84101

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the Council for the Municipality of Dutton Dunwich, the proposed policy 4.3.3 Lot Creation and Lot Adjustments are supported. Please see attached Council resolution 2023.07.35 dated March 8, 2023. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84107

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Give it a rest. Curb the greed. The last thing that Ontario needs is further development. Put $$ towards useless land/already developed land (GM site in St Catharines). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84118

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This policy will not help people looking for homes or address the costs of living and housing, but instead further the neverending sprawl that southern Ontario has become infested with over the decades while undermining local communities and further increasing environmental impacts both direct and i Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84120

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I can name countless streets in Niagara where Municipalities install sewers where only one side of the street can tie in due to the other side of the same street being outside of the Urban Boundary. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84121

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My concerns are that the policy is ignoring the existing properties and lands that exist within cities, as well as opportunities to increase the density of core areas, which already have existing transit and other infrastructure. Lire davantage