Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84123

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Infinite growth is impossible and unsustainable. This is not about creating a future and there's no altruism here. This is greed. An insatiable pursuit for more. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84128

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We have the means to grow within and not out. We need mixed zoning and more vaccant unit taxes. Destroying our farm and conservation areas wil pnly harm is in the long run as weve seen woth groind water studys.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84133

Commentaire fait au nom

Oskar Group

Statut du commentaire

A letter has been enclosed that details the comments resulting from the review of the proposed amendments. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84143

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Serious terrible work... Continued Urban Sprawl growth is a Ponzi Scheme. The only way to pay for all this is with more harmful Urban Sprawl and real Urban Areas Subsidizing the Suburbs. It is an economic and environmental disaster. Just to make a bunch of rich developer richer. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84145

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I feel that new housing developments or land use wrt housing should not go into rural settlement areas or agricultural areas. We need to protect our dwindling and important farmlands and significant wetlands and greenspace. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84147

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed policy disincentives developers from building in densely populated urban areas - yet, cities are more efficient for mobility, use less resources and will host more resilient infrastructure to support the growing Canada population and impacts of climate change. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84149

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

These proposed policies miss the mark completely on a prosperous and healthy Ontario. Every effort should be made to freeze urban boundaries and create increased density housing, commercial and industrial spaces. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84154

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposal is very concerning and harmful in several ways. - There is no real need for new lands for building, which has already been amply proven. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84164

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We support the proposed changes and support the amendments to the Provincial Policy Statement regarding agricultural consents.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84443

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Key to land-use development anywhere in the world is the fact that our natural heritage and farmland are what support our lives, health and economies. All else is built on this. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84570

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am in support of the proposed changes that would permit residential lot creation / severances in Rural Areas. Existing rural roads can be lined with rural residential lots while maintaining the majority of the farmland behind. Let Ontario residents live in the countryside!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84612

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose the government’s new policies regarding heritage preservation. We are losing our heritage so much we value as a consequence! Please review and revise!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84641

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Enough is enough! "Require municipalities to prepare for the impacts of a changing climate and develop approaches to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality" Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84699

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This government has demonstrated that by recklessly making off-the-cuff decisions, that it actually plans really poorly. As a good example, we can look to the plan to demolish the Ontario Science Centre for housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84709

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We have a farm in halton in greenbelt and rural NEC. We volunteer on every committee for farming . Our farm is small 46 acres with half in Forest NHS and 23 acres clear. Before this proposal our farm designation is Rural land . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84713

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

After reviewing the proposed document for ERO-019-6813 we implore you to rethink the prime ag designation on our rural farm property. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84717

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I believe this proposal is great and will solve the housing crisis in the near future

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

84769

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Dear Provincial Government, Please do not scrap provincial density targets! Please encourage infilling and the missing middle, and please, please, please eliminate exclusionary zoning in all residential areas to encourage the missing middle. Lire davantage