Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

122058

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

Proposed Amendment 8 (iii): With regards to select substances added to soil to facilitate excavation (e.g. drilling muds, solidifying agents), the contents of these substances are often proprietary in nature. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

122059

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

Can the Ministry clarify if it is their intent that excess soil used in a product or sold as a product that leaves a depot (e.g. landscaping depot) is no longer considered excess soil?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

122060

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

The initial experience with the Regulation to date has shown that soil contamination at levels exceeding the generic ESQS is far more common than was likely anticipated by the Ministry in formulating this Regulatory approach. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

122061

Commentaire fait au nom

Dillon Consulting Limited

Statut du commentaire

Proposed Amendment 7 We are interested in the MECP's Regional mapping of naturally occurring local background concentrations proposal, however agree that it will require additional consultation and are interested in being part of that discussion.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

122062

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Windsor

Statut du commentaire

Please see attached comments on the proposed amendments to the Excess Soil Regulation, which emphasize the following points - Greater flexibility for aggregates - Ministry responsibility for regional background concentration mapping Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

122067

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

While the proposed amendments are a great step in the right direction, it is still very clear that certain industries are being caught in a regulation that is much better suited for non-industrial sectors. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

122068

Commentaire fait au nom

Canadian Fuels Association

Statut du commentaire

Please see attached PDF. Re: ERO #019-9196 – Enabling greater beneficial reuse of excess soil On behalf of the Canadian Fuels Association (CFA), we thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on ERO #019-9196. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

122071

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Guelph

Statut du commentaire

The City of Guelph appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback regarding the proposed regulatory amendments to streamline the beneficial reuse of excess soil. Attached are the City's comments and recommendations regarding the proposed amendments. Lire davantage