Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114770

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I live on Bloor and there isn't a traffic problem. There is a culture war problem from this government, but not a traffic problem.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114773

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Bill is a how to in induced demand. It won't reduce traffic or gridlock but will be a lot of money to increase it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114784

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The bike lanes in the City of Toronto significantly improve my quality of life and it is a waste of taxpayer money to destroy them. As a recent graduate working a new 9-5 office job it is difficult to find time for exercise in my new life. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114800

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I support bill 212 and NOT the Cities motions https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2024.MM23.14 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114812

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

How will bill 212 save me time? I don't have a car. You keep saying it should be on parallel side streets which there are no of. That's why you won't actually name the alternative routes because they don't exist. So this bill will cost me time. More time spent getting to work. More time shopping. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114856

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 212 needs to be reviewed for ethics violations. It is transparently a kickback to certain developers. They are trying to distract from this by making people angry about bike lanes.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114872

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Removing or preventing the implementation of bike lanes is bad for people, small businesses and the environment. Pedestrians and cyclists are safer when there are bike lanes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114898

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm writing to share my dismay at the Ontario government's decision to propose Bill 212. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114903

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am very concerned about the loss of bike lanes. I know 3 SAFE riders who have been injured/ lost their lives to the lack of safe places to ride. I do not support on any level a reduction of bike lanes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114927

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I cycle, drive, walk and use transit in Toronto. The bike lanes on Bloor are an essentially biking commuting artery for me. If I did not have access to those bikes lanes I would likely be driving adding more driving congestion rather than decreasing the congestion. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114942

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Words cannot adequately express how strong I disagree with the proposed Bill 212 for the following reasons: - This bill will result in the deaths of people living in Ontario, people the government has a duty to. Bike lanes save lives. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114958

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Building Highways Faster Act that Bill 212 is proposing in order to reduce gridlock by speeding up the construction of Highway 413 and the creation of the Bradford Bypass will make little to no difference on users daily commutes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114959

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing my comment to express my disapproval of Bill 212, especially schedule 4. Ontario has historically lagged behind in smart urban development, including adequate density, sufficient public transit, and especially cycling infrastructure. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114976

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I doubt that the bicycle path would warrant the expense. We frequently attend church at Bloor and Windermere. We leave our house near Bloor and Tomken at 10 am and return at noon. On two Sundays in March when the weather was sunny, we counted cyclists to and from chiurch. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

114986

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

That is a HARD NO! No more Sustainable Development goals. NO more climate change b.s. News Flash: it's not climate change when its man made weather manipulation. No you CANNOT HAVE OUR LAND NO YOU WORK FOR US

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

115016

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Regarding the proposal to reassess bicycle lanes. I live and work in downtown Toronto. I am a physician. I ride a bicycle and drive a car in Toronto. The separated bike lanes added in Toronto in recent years (including Bloor Street and University Avenue) have made my commute much Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

115018

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

So this government is only concerned rich car owners. Got it. First you close the safe injection sites in my neighbourhood so there are needles and drugs in public. Then you want try and turn a street into a highway cutting right through it. We live here, we don't want these policies. Lire davantage